2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2018.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological effects in photodynamic treatment combined with electropermeabilization in wild and drug resistant breast cancer cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was shown that MCF-7/DX cells were more susceptible to electroporation than wild-type breast cancer cells. Similar to our research, increased MDR1, GSTpi, and MRP7 protein levels after electroporation of breast cancer cells were reported [51]. The authors indicated that one of the factors that differ between normal and cancer cells is the fraction and localization of the negatively charged phospholipid PS [52].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It was shown that MCF-7/DX cells were more susceptible to electroporation than wild-type breast cancer cells. Similar to our research, increased MDR1, GSTpi, and MRP7 protein levels after electroporation of breast cancer cells were reported [51]. The authors indicated that one of the factors that differ between normal and cancer cells is the fraction and localization of the negatively charged phospholipid PS [52].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In our study the following electroporation parameters were applied: 8 square pulses, 100 µs width, delivered at 1 Hz frequency, which corresponded to ESOPE protocol [34]. Our previous study demonstrated that the application of electric pulses increases cell membrane permeability to propidium iodide in human breast adenocarcinoma cells [14,32,41,42]. The dose of DOX with no cytotoxic effect was determined using a metabolic activity assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among many compounds tested, that is, doxorubicin, 36 ruthenium (III) compound, 37 5-fluorouracil, 38 phthalocyanines, 39 photofrin, 40 curcumin, 41 the trans-platinum analogue trans-[PtCl 2 (3-hmpy) 2 ], 42 oxaliplatin, 43 betulinic acid, 44,45 oat b-glucan, 46 cyanine IR-775, 47 catechin, 48 and sodium decahydrodecaborate, 49 only calcium electroporation was extensively studied. [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] Calcium electroporation effectively causes tumor necrosis, leaving the normal tissue less affected, making it a very promising compound for further clinical evaluation as it does not belong to the antineoplastic drugs, thus precautions related to antineoplastic drugs regarding storage, handling, disposal, and toxicity and mutagenicity are not an issue for calcium electroporation.…”
Section: Recent Advances In Electrochemotherapy 205mentioning
confidence: 99%