2003
DOI: 10.1051/gse:2003016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological effect of varying peptide binding affinity to the BoLA-DRB3*2703 allele

Abstract: -MHC class I and II molecules are immunoregulatory cell surface glycoproteins, which selectively bind to and present antigenic peptides to T-lymphocytes. Murine and human studies show that variable peptide binding affinity to MHC II molecules influences Th1/Th2 responses by inducing distinctive cytokine expression. To examine the biological effects of peptide binding affinity to bovine MHC (BoLA), various self peptides (BoLA-DQ and fibrinogen fragments) and non-self peptides from ovalbumin (OVA), as well as VP… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present work confirms the existence of correlations between susceptibility to disease and a specific MHC haplotype reported in animal and man [1,5,10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The present work confirms the existence of correlations between susceptibility to disease and a specific MHC haplotype reported in animal and man [1,5,10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…1). The CESFLQKN marker sequence which we observed could induce spatial modifications in the binding groove pockets leading to alterations in the binding efficiency of some peptides [1,10]. It is possible that these peptides are exposed to pathogen proteases and are either not recognized or poorly recognized by the T cell receptor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, he explains, by quoting Alizadeh et al (23) that this cannot conclude that the information in the expression of CMH genes, does not improve the mechanisms involved in the resistance to diseases or that it is not one of the many tools that may be used to improve animal health and indirectly productivity in these particular populations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%