2013
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht308.p1254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological determinants of neointimal proliferation after intracoronary therapy with drug-eluting devices: role of endothelial progenitor cells and cytokines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EPC are seen as a surrogate biomarker of cardiovascular health and vascular functional status [ 7 ]. A decreased EPC pool has been linked to adverse cardiovascular events, in-stent neointimal hyperplasia and endothelial dysfunction [ 5 7 , 25 ]. Current evidence for the protective role of EPC mainly derives from animal and ex vivo studies, while most clinical studies rely on surrogate parameters for atherosclerotic disease severity [ 27 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…EPC are seen as a surrogate biomarker of cardiovascular health and vascular functional status [ 7 ]. A decreased EPC pool has been linked to adverse cardiovascular events, in-stent neointimal hyperplasia and endothelial dysfunction [ 5 7 , 25 ]. Current evidence for the protective role of EPC mainly derives from animal and ex vivo studies, while most clinical studies rely on surrogate parameters for atherosclerotic disease severity [ 27 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EPC were identified by flow cytometry according to their surface antigens CD34, CD133 and KDR as described before [9, 25]. Red blood cells were lysed using lysing solution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In England, significant costs are devoted to treating and managing potentially avoidable diabetes complications. The most comprehensive estimate of total annual cost of type 1 and type 2 diabetes to the National Health Service (NHS) was £9.8 billion in 2010/11; 1 inflating this cost gives an estimated direct cost for 2016/2017 of £11.5 billion. Avoiding short- and long-term complications requires frequent hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) testing and daily self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) for type 1 and insulin-treated type 2 diabetes patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Avoiding short- and long-term complications requires frequent hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) testing and daily self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) for type 1 and insulin-treated type 2 diabetes patients. 1 SMBG encompasses a system of strips paired with a device that tracks glucose concentrations multiple times per day for patients treated with intensive insulin therapy. Frequent SMBG improves HbA1c and assists in avoiding diabetes-related complications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%