2006
DOI: 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)004[0132:bcoiss]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological control of invasive species: solution or pollution?

Abstract: Biological control of invasive species using co‐evolved natural enemies has long been considered a safe, cost effective, and environmentally benign tool for pest management. However, recent work has questioned the extent to which these imported natural enemies have negative impacts on populations of non‐target species. The result has been a vociferous debate about the safety and proper role of biological control, often without convincing evidence on either side. The issues are particularly well focused in Hawa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
167
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
167
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, regarding invasive alien plants, it appears that only some very localized removals have been completed (Capdevila-Argüelles et al, 2005). Biological control is an effective and valuable tool to control invasion through releasing natural enemies or competitors from the invader's native range (Hoddle, 2004;Messing and Wright, 2006), though usually with risk of negative impacts of the introduced biological control agents on local ecosystems (Henneman and Memmott, 2001;Messing and Wright, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, regarding invasive alien plants, it appears that only some very localized removals have been completed (Capdevila-Argüelles et al, 2005). Biological control is an effective and valuable tool to control invasion through releasing natural enemies or competitors from the invader's native range (Hoddle, 2004;Messing and Wright, 2006), though usually with risk of negative impacts of the introduced biological control agents on local ecosystems (Henneman and Memmott, 2001;Messing and Wright, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major obstacles are the risk of an environmental contamination of natural areas with the chemical, non-target effects on native species, or the evolution of pesticide-resistance by the invasive species (Baker et al, 2005;Lodge et al, 2006;Myers and Bazely, 2003;Wittenberg and Cock, 2001). In the case of biological control a natural enemy such as a herbivore or pathogen is introduced with the aim that the introduced organism controls the invasive species (Babendreier, 2007;Messing and Wright, 2006;Mack and Barrett, 2002;Thomas and Reid, 2007). Major risks of the introduction of an (alien) organism in biological control programs are non-target effects on the native biota.…”
Section: Control Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, perceptions of a species as "good" or "bad" may change through time and across stakeholder groups, with implications for management decisions (García-Llorente et al 2008, Stromberg et al 2009). Control of invasive species may trigger controversies because of high economic costs, uncertainties, divergent stakeholder interests, and ethical concerns (Messing and Wright 2006, Haider and Jax 2007, Evans et al 2008, Nuñez et al 2012. Data sought to justify specific control methods include cost-benefit analyses and assessments of potential efficacy and side effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%