Biological control of Eutypa armeniacae. II. Studies of the interaction between E. armeniacae and Fusarium lateritium, and their relative sensitivities to benzimidazole chemicals

Carter, MV; Price, T. V.

doi:10.1071/ar9740105

Cited by 42 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In our studies of antagonistic and mycoparasitic fungi, in Hungary, an isolate of Fusarium lateritium showed a similar inhibitory effect on different fungi to those described by CARTER and PRICE (1974). We mentioned that this fungus can parasite some phytopathogenic and saprophytic fungi.…”

supporting

confidence: 70%

“…Some isolates of Trichoderma: T. koningii (Tk-3) and T. pseudokoningii parasited hyphae of F. lateritium. The mutual inhibition of the growth of the colonies of F. lateritium and the test fungi can be explained by the production of fungistatic diffusible substances, as it was demonstrated by CARTER and PRICE (1974).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 79%

“…Recently, BUSHNELL et al (1984) have identified lateropyrone, a new antibiotic from the fungus. CARTER and PRICE (1974) studied in vitro, the interaction between Fusarium lateritium and Eutypa armeniacae. They established a strong inhibition in the growth of Eutypa armeniacae, which was due to the production of a non-volatile, diffusible antifungal substance produced by Fusarium lateritium.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Fusarium lateritium Nees ex Link as a Parasite and Host in Interfungal Hyphal Interactions

Vajna

1987

Journal of Phytopathology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In dual cultures Fusarium lateritium Nees ex Link coiled, penetrated and destroyed young actively growing hyphae of Botrytis cinerea Pers., Cytospora rubescens Fr., Eutypa armeniacae Hansf. et Carter, Sphaeropsis malorum Peck, Rhizoctonia solani Kühn, Trichoderma koningii Oud. (Tk‐1) and Trichoderma hamatum (Bon.) Bain. (Tha‐2), and conidiophores and conidia of Botrytis cinerea Pers. The isolates of Trichoderma koningii Oud. (Tk‐3) and Trichoderma pseudokoningii Rifai (Tp‐1) parasited and destroyed the hyphae of Fusarium lateritium. There was no hyphal interaction between Fusarium lateritium and an isolate of Trichoderma longibrachiatum Rifai. Hyphal, interactions occurred mostly on the aerial hyphae of test fungi which grew over the inhibition zone formed between the colonies of Fusarium lateritium and the test fungus, and contacted the hyphae of Fusarium lateritium. Details of dual culture studies are given.

show abstract

supporting

confidence: 70%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 79%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Fusarium lateritium Nees ex Link as a Parasite and Host in Interfungal Hyphal Interactions

Vajna

1987

Journal of Phytopathology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The iatrogenic effect of fungicides is due to the removal of these natural biological control mechanisms and the loss of natural biological control agents has been implicated in other iatrogenic disease situations as reviewed by Griffiths (1981). In at least one of these, dieback of apricots caused by Eutypa armeniaceae, the active component was identified and subsequently used in an integrated control programme (Carter and Price 1974). There is increasing evidence that endophytes may play a role in limiting disease and Arnold et al (2003) have recently shown that endophytes in cacao can protect against leaf infection by Phytophthora.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The microflora of coffee surfaces and relationships to coffee berry disease

Waller

Masaba

2006

International Journal of Pest Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Data from previous trials that have been re-evaluated indicate that low levels of coffee berry disease on unsprayed coffee are associated with higher populations of microflora on coffee tissues. Samples were taken at different seasons and altitudes, and from coffee plots receiving different fungicide treatments for the control of coffee berry disease. Although largest populations occurred at the highest altitudes, the relative proportions of microflora components varied with altitude. Fungicides reduced populations of filamentous fungi on all tissues. Trees that had never received fungicide had low populations of Colletotrichum kahawae and had very low levels of coffee berry disease. The disease was also at a lower level on trees that had not been sprayed with fungicides for two seasons where microflora populations were highest. The likely effects of microflora components on coffee berry disease and their potential as biological control agents are discussed.

show abstract

“…Historically, management of Eutypa dieback relied on sanitary practices as well as the protection of the surface area of pruning woods by phytosanitary products (Carter and Price 1974;Rolshausen and Gubler 2005;Bester et al 2007). At the moment, apart from fungicide use, various Trichoderma strains are in discussion as potential biocontrol agents for dieback (John et al 2004;Halleen et al 2010;Kotze 2008).…”

Section: Biocontrol Of Fungal Trunk Diseasesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Use of beneficial bacteria and their secondary metabolites to control grapevine pathogen diseases

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

International audienceGrapevine is one of the most important economic crops yielding berries, wine products as well as derivates. However, due to the large array of pathogens inducing diseases on this plant, considerableamounts of pesticides—with possible negative impact on the environment and health—have been used and are currently used in viticulture. To avoid negative impacts of such products and to ensure product quality, a substantial fraction of pesticides needs to be replaced in the near future. One solution can be related to the use of beneficial bacteria inhabiting the rhizo- and/or the endosphere of plants. These biocontrol bacteria and their secondary metabolites can reduce directly or indirectly pathogen diseases by affecting pathogen performance by antibiosis, competition for niches and nutrients, interference with pathogen signaling or by stimulation of host plant defenses. Due to the large demand for biocontrol of grapevine diseases, such biopesticides, their modes of actions and putative consequences of their uses need to be described. Moreover, the current knowledge on new strains from the rhizo- and endosphere and their metabolites that can be used on grapevine plants to counteract pathogen attack needs to be discussed. This is in particular with regard to the control of root rot, grey mould, trunk diseases, powdery and downy mildews, pierce’s disease, grapevine yellows as well as crown gall. Future prospects on specific beneficial microbes and their secondary metabolites that can be used as elicitors of plant defenses and/or as biocontrol agents with potential use in a more sustainable viticulture will be further discussed

show abstract

Biological control of Eutypa armeniacae. II. Studies of the interaction between E. armeniacae and Fusarium lateritium, and their relative sensitivities to benzimidazole chemicals

Abstract: Fusarium lateritium, a saprophyte sometimes associated with apricot trees, inhibits in vitro germination and growth of Eutypa armeniacae.

Cited by 42 publications

References 14 publications

Fusarium lateritium Nees ex Link as a Parasite and Host in Interfungal Hyphal Interactions

Fusarium lateritium Nees ex Link as a Parasite and Host in Interfungal Hyphal Interactions

The microflora of coffee surfaces and relationships to coffee berry disease

Use of beneficial bacteria and their secondary metabolites to control grapevine pathogen diseases

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About