2006
DOI: 10.1080/00379271.2006.10697487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological control of cereal stem borers in Kenya: A cost benefit approach

Abstract: Lepidopteran stem borers are the key pests of maize in Sub-Saharan Africa. In the lowland tropics, dry mid-altitude, dry transitional and the moist mid-altitude zones of Kenya, the invasive crambid Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) causes up to 73% yield loss. The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE) started a biological control (BC) program in 1991 to control stem borers in subsistence agriculture in Africa with emphasis on classical BC of C. partellus. The project re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study explored the implications of using an ecologically based host-parasitoid interaction on the welfare of communities in East and Southern Africa, and showed that the ecosystem service provided by beneficial insects was advantageous to farmers as well as consumers. To our knowledge, no comparable empirical studies on ex-post economic impact of the icipe classical biological control programme on cereal pests has been undertaken or published, but the cost-benefit analysis provided by Kipkoech et al (2006) is a reference point in such a discussion. The cited exante analysis predicted the benefit-cost ratio to reach 19:1 by the end of the 20-year period for maize in coastal Kenya.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study explored the implications of using an ecologically based host-parasitoid interaction on the welfare of communities in East and Southern Africa, and showed that the ecosystem service provided by beneficial insects was advantageous to farmers as well as consumers. To our knowledge, no comparable empirical studies on ex-post economic impact of the icipe classical biological control programme on cereal pests has been undertaken or published, but the cost-benefit analysis provided by Kipkoech et al (2006) is a reference point in such a discussion. The cited exante analysis predicted the benefit-cost ratio to reach 19:1 by the end of the 20-year period for maize in coastal Kenya.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Almost all the studies emphasized the first biological control agent that was released, Cotesia flavipes (Cameron) and focused on its short-term assessment (10 years after release), but economic assessments on the real social advantage were not carried out. Kipkoech et al (2006) to some extent assessed the economic advantages of the natural enemies released using cost-benefit analyses based on yield loss reduction and predictions of parasitism levels and pest densities. The latter ex-ante study lacked results from exclusion experiments, which help in strengthening impact evaluations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing the geographical distribution of maize yields with release rates of Cotesia flavipes Cameron (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) over 20 years in Kenya, Africa, Kipkoech et al (2006) estimated a BCR of 19:1 due to parasitism of the stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). In this study, reductions in yield were estimated using established pest density-yield loss functions rather than actual on-farm data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Another indication of success was the positive economic impact associated with the introduction. 9,10 In Ethiopia, Cot. flavipes was recorded for the first time in 1999 by Emana et al, without being released.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%