1980
DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-53-629-398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological control in a plutonium production facility. Mackenzie Davidson Memorial Lecture, Thursday, May 17, 1979

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That the analysis for radionuclides in tissues removed from nuclear workers at autopsy had been undertaken was already known when the Redfern Inquiry was established-a number of papers published in the open scientific literature had referred to this work, for example, Schofield (1980) and Lawson et al (1989) refer to results for Sellafield workers, while Donoghue et al (1972) and Roberts et al (1977) refer to findings for Springfields workers. One reason for the unexpected length of the Inquiry is that although attention was initially concentrated on BNFL workers, and especially Sellafield, it quickly became apparent to the Inquiry that scientific research involving the radionuclide content of tissues removed at autopsy had been carried out elsewhere, notably projects involving members of the public conducted by the Medical Research Council (MRC) and the National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB, now the Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency).…”
Section: Reflections On the Redfern Inquirymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That the analysis for radionuclides in tissues removed from nuclear workers at autopsy had been undertaken was already known when the Redfern Inquiry was established-a number of papers published in the open scientific literature had referred to this work, for example, Schofield (1980) and Lawson et al (1989) refer to results for Sellafield workers, while Donoghue et al (1972) and Roberts et al (1977) refer to findings for Springfields workers. One reason for the unexpected length of the Inquiry is that although attention was initially concentrated on BNFL workers, and especially Sellafield, it quickly became apparent to the Inquiry that scientific research involving the radionuclide content of tissues removed at autopsy had been carried out elsewhere, notably projects involving members of the public conducted by the Medical Research Council (MRC) and the National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB, now the Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency).…”
Section: Reflections On the Redfern Inquirymentioning
confidence: 99%