2007
DOI: 10.1002/adma.200601168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological Containers: Protein Cages as Multifunctional Nanoplatforms

Abstract: Materials scientists increasingly draw inspiration from the study of how biological systems fabricate materials under mild synthetic conditions by using self‐assembled macromolecular templates. Containerlike protein architectures such as viral capsids and ferritin are examples of such biological templates. These protein cages have three distinct interfaces that can be synthetically exploited: the interior, the exterior, and the interface between subunits. The subunits that comprise the building blocks of these… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
518
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 530 publications
(524 citation statements)
references
References 187 publications
(203 reference statements)
1
518
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 Moreover, protein-protein interactions are also integral to the generation of cellular selfassembled nano-structures, and establishing how they control self-assembly could lead not only to fundamental understanding but also to the eventual rational design of novel structures for a myriad of applications such as the templation of inorganic nano-materials and for encapsulated reaction chemistry. [3][4][5][6][7][8] Although protein-protein interactions are intriguing medicinal targets, they have only recently been pursued for drug development studies somewhat owing to the discovery that although they often involve large, buried surface area, they can be inhibited using low molecular weight small molecules that target ''hot spot'' residues where the binding energy is concentrated. 9,10 Alanine shaving, where individual side changes are conceptually shaved to a methyl residuum and where the stabilities of the resulting mutants are determined with respect to wild type, is the most common method to identify hot spot residues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Moreover, protein-protein interactions are also integral to the generation of cellular selfassembled nano-structures, and establishing how they control self-assembly could lead not only to fundamental understanding but also to the eventual rational design of novel structures for a myriad of applications such as the templation of inorganic nano-materials and for encapsulated reaction chemistry. [3][4][5][6][7][8] Although protein-protein interactions are intriguing medicinal targets, they have only recently been pursued for drug development studies somewhat owing to the discovery that although they often involve large, buried surface area, they can be inhibited using low molecular weight small molecules that target ''hot spot'' residues where the binding energy is concentrated. 9,10 Alanine shaving, where individual side changes are conceptually shaved to a methyl residuum and where the stabilities of the resulting mutants are determined with respect to wild type, is the most common method to identify hot spot residues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such viruses can also be thought of as tunable colloids or nanoscale scaffolds. 14,15 Control over placement of…”
Section: -4 45mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] However, it is still challenging to manipulate their self-assembly in a controlled way and to analyze their assembled products precisely at the molecular level. 14,15 In this study, we have generated two different individual mutants of a protein cage with functional groups either inside or outside of the cage ( Figure 1A).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%