2008
DOI: 10.1021/ac801228t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological/Biomedical Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Targets. 2. Physical, Morphological, and Structural Characteristics

Abstract: The number of biological/biomedical applications that require AMS to achieve their goals is increasing, and so is the need for a better understanding of the physical, morphological, and structural traits of high quality of AMS targets. The metrics of quality included color, hardness/texture, and appearance (photo and SEM), along with FT-IR, Raman, and powder X-ray diffraction spectra that correlate positively with reliable and intense ion currents and accuracy, precision, and sensitivity of fraction modern (Fm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(183 reference statements)
4
30
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the correction curve using the graphite standard( 18 ) (GST, 14 C deficient sample, >46 600-year-old) was mass-dependent, so that the F m of the GST (Figure 1 A) was increased as carbon mass decreased, and this was consistent with prior studies. 13 , 16 The correction curve using the Ox-2 (Figure 1 B) was also mass-dependent; however, the pattern of the Ox-2 correction curve was opposite that in prior studies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the present study, the correction curve using the graphite standard( 18 ) (GST, 14 C deficient sample, >46 600-year-old) was mass-dependent, so that the F m of the GST (Figure 1 A) was increased as carbon mass decreased, and this was consistent with prior studies. 13 , 16 The correction curve using the Ox-2 (Figure 1 B) was also mass-dependent; however, the pattern of the Ox-2 correction curve was opposite that in prior studies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Although differences of F m between the AMS targets of GCIP (T s carbon) and GCIP (nongraphitic carbon) were not significant ( P < 0.9804), the AMS target of GCIP (T s carbon) had less accurate and precise F m value (relative error of 0.57%) than the AMS target of GCIP (nongraphitic carbon, 8,11 relative error of −0.02%) (Figure 6c). In addition, the AMS target of GCIP (T s carbon) produced an ≈40% lower 12 C − , 13 C + , and normalized 13 C + (n 13 C + ) currents ( P < 0.0001) than the AMS target of GCIP (nongraphitic carbon 8,11 ) (Figure 6d−f).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The L a of this GCIP was 4.4 nm, and the L c of this GCIP was not measurable due to its small size graphite crystallite, lack of stacking sequence/order, or both (Figure 3b). Full width half-maximum (fwhm) of D and G bands in the AMS target of GCIP in Figure 3b were 2 to 3 times broader than those in the GST(8) (Figure 3a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both methods are time consuming and require an overnight combustion step to generate CO 2 from the dried sample. Kim et al investigated the graphitization process and the physical properties of the graphite [2022]. …”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%