2009
DOI: 10.1021/mp900093r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological Barriers to Therapy with Antisense and siRNA Oligonucleotides

Abstract: Attaining the full therapeutic utility of antisense and siRNA oligonucleotides will require understanding of the biological barriers that stand between initial administration of these drugs and their final actions within cells. This article examines some of the key barriers that affect the biodistribution of oligonucleotides both in molecular form and when they are associated with nanocarriers. An understanding of the biological processes underlying these barriers will aid in the design of more effective deliv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
218
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
2
218
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Systemic delivery of naked siRNA to the target tissue is ineffective due to its sensitivity to nuclease degradation and net negative charges which prevents interactions with the plasma membrane [3,4]. Although the emergence of synthetic gene carriers has broadened the potential applications of siRNA therapeutics to a variety of tissue-specific diseases, most carriers have low biocompatability and/or inadequate delivery kinetics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systemic delivery of naked siRNA to the target tissue is ineffective due to its sensitivity to nuclease degradation and net negative charges which prevents interactions with the plasma membrane [3,4]. Although the emergence of synthetic gene carriers has broadened the potential applications of siRNA therapeutics to a variety of tissue-specific diseases, most carriers have low biocompatability and/or inadequate delivery kinetics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The short-lived ASO Opn effect in this study may be improved by suited oligonucleotide chemistries such as 2 0 -OH modifications, or the use of locked or peptide nucleic acids. 32,33 In variance to the ASO Opn , its complementary senseoligomer showed an unexpected antitumor effect. The anti-proliferative effect of the SO in vitro was only marginally better, but surpassed that of the ASO Opn significantly in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…General physiological barriers inhibiting a sufficient activity of single-stranded oligomers include a rapid renal clearance, a tight endothelial cell barrier, oligomer degradation by plasma nuclease activity and clearance by immune cells, such as circulating monocytes and tissue macrophages. 32 Several chemical modifications have been developed over the past years for oligomers to deal with these barriers. The most common stabilizing modification against nucleases is the substitution of a sulfur atom for a non-bridging phosphate oxygen atom, as was used for the ASO Opn .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This safe consumption results in part from extensive barriers to ingested RNAs, such as low gut pH, nucleases, multiple membrane barriers, and rapid renal elimination of RNA . These barriers are also evidenced by drug delivery challenges faced by developers of oligonucleotide-based drugs (Juliano et al 2009;O'Neill et al 2011;Petrick et al 2013). Further studies in mammals indicate that ingested doublestranded RNAs, even those targeting a gene in the test species, do not produce adverse health effects in these animals (Petrick et al 2015).…”
Section: Jan Verhaert and Jay S Petrick Monsanto Company Belgium Amentioning
confidence: 99%