2012
DOI: 10.17221/187/2011-agricecon
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological assets reporting: Is the increase in value caused by the biological transformation revenue?

Abstract: Agricultural activity diff ers from other activities carried out by business units to achieve the profi t. Agricultural activity is in comparison with other activities of business subjects dependent on the natural and environmental conditions, and therefore the agriculture specialization is narrowly connected with geographical position. Th e aim of the paper is to identify the possible obstacles in the practical application of the International Accounting Standard 41 (IAS 41) and to suggest the possible ways o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
26
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The specifics of agricultural production and the biological transformation connected with that type of production are not taken into account by most of the existing accounting systems (Bohušová et al 2012). According to Sedláček (2010), in comparison with other economic branches, the agricultural activity is characterized by specific activities that require the appropriate accounting treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specifics of agricultural production and the biological transformation connected with that type of production are not taken into account by most of the existing accounting systems (Bohušová et al 2012). According to Sedláček (2010), in comparison with other economic branches, the agricultural activity is characterized by specific activities that require the appropriate accounting treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He finally concluded that the treatment of fixed assets (IAS 16: Property, Plant and Equipment) is the most appropriate for the bearer biological assets held for more than one year. Bohušová et al (2012) have identified some obstacles to the practical application of the IAS 41 and suggested ways to deal with them. Starting from a comparative analysis of different accounting treatments for biological assets, they have highlighted that the main aim of the standard seems not to have been achieved.…”
Section: Doi: 1017221/48/2015-agriceconmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of this standard has been highlighted in many studies (Argilès and Slof 2001;Penttinen et al 2004;Herbohn and Herbohn 2006;Lefter and Roman 2007;Svensson et al 2008;Argilès et al 2009;Elad and Herbohn 2011;Bohušová et al 2012;Feleagă et al 2012) and criticized in others (Elad 2007;Aryanto 2011;Bohušová et al 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values are usually determined by some limiting quotas. These are followed in the financial statements (kinds and values) and they are subject to audit (Bohušová et al 2012). The data are considered to be of a high quality and they can be integrated in other systems; they can be used for the applied research.…”
Section: Environmental Accounting and The Fadn As A Basis Of Model Fomentioning
confidence: 99%