2014
DOI: 10.1002/bmc.3177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological and chemical standardization of a hop (Humulus lupulus) botanical dietary supplement

Abstract: Concerned about the safety of conventional estrogen replacement therapy, women are using botanical dietary supplements as alternatives for the management of menopausal symptoms such as hot flashes. Before botanical dietary supplements can be evaluated clinically for safety and efficacy, botanically authenticated and standardized forms are required. To address the demand for a standardized, estrogenic botanical dietary supplement, an extract of hops (Humulus lupulus, L.) was developed. Although valued in the br… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As reported previously (Krause et al, 2014), using a LC-MS/MS method, XN is the major constituent of the extract (35.78 %), followed by 6-PN (2.18 %), IX (1.35 %) and 8-PN with (0.42 %). Accordingly, there is an approximate 100:1 ratio between the abundance of XN and 8-PN.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As reported previously (Krause et al, 2014), using a LC-MS/MS method, XN is the major constituent of the extract (35.78 %), followed by 6-PN (2.18 %), IX (1.35 %) and 8-PN with (0.42 %). Accordingly, there is an approximate 100:1 ratio between the abundance of XN and 8-PN.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In 2014, Krause et al described the chemical standardization of a hops botanical supplement which has also been standardized for estrogenic properties (Krause et al, 2014). Subsequently, the pharmacokinetic of this hops extract was investigated in five post-menopausal women (van Breemen et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations