2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.03.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological Age vs. Chronological Age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But this may not always be true. Because it has been shown that chronological age is less important with the replacement of the concept of biological age 9 . With increased biological age, planned procedures and treatment schemes for cancer patients may vary, and treatment‐related toxicities may be detected more frequently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But this may not always be true. Because it has been shown that chronological age is less important with the replacement of the concept of biological age 9 . With increased biological age, planned procedures and treatment schemes for cancer patients may vary, and treatment‐related toxicities may be detected more frequently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remarkably, the value judgement provided by the attending physician is age-related and positive, in contrast to the surgeons’ negative age-related value judgement. The value judgement provided by this physician is based on the view that biological age as expressed through the vitality of the patient is a better foundation for medical decision-making than chronological age 1 2. If the surgeons visit him, they will probably agree.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the choice and dosage of a treatment should be based on an individual’s biological age rather than their chronological age. 52 For example, a cross-sectional study demonstrated that 58 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus had a significantly older vascular age, with an 8.8-year difference ( P < 0.001), and a higher cardiovascular disease risk stratification ( P < 0.001) than chronological age control individuals. 53 Therefore, approved dose reduction criteria must consider various biological components or factors, such as renal function, concomitant medication usage, and weight, although regional variations do exist across the approved DOAC labels ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Evidence Of the Use Of Low-dose Doacs For Gray Area Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%