1987
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330740312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological affinities between the migrant groups of fishermen of Puri Coast, Orissa, India

Abstract: Biological affinities between the three endogamous groups of marine fishermen of Puri are examined with the help of nine anthropometric measurements and 22 dermatoglyphic traits of fingers and palms. The results are interpreted in the light of their ethnic, geographical, and migrational backgrounds. Multiple discriminant analysis and Mahalanobis's generalized distances suggest higher discrimination of populations with reference to anthropometric traits as compared to that in dermatoglyphic variables. While the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At Puri, the population sizes of the three groups are about 8000, 4000 and 800 respectively. More details of these populations, including their demographic structures and biological variations, can be found in Reddy (1984), Reddy, Chopra and Mukherjee (1987), Reddy, Chopra, Karmakar and Malhotra (1988) and Reddy, Chopra, Rodewaldt, Mukherjee and Malhotra (1989). Finger ridge-count data on 676 individuals, both male and female, of these groups were utilized for the present study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At Puri, the population sizes of the three groups are about 8000, 4000 and 800 respectively. More details of these populations, including their demographic structures and biological variations, can be found in Reddy (1984), Reddy, Chopra and Mukherjee (1987), Reddy, Chopra, Karmakar and Malhotra (1988) and Reddy, Chopra, Rodewaldt, Mukherjee and Malhotra (1989). Finger ridge-count data on 676 individuals, both male and female, of these groups were utilized for the present study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is basically at this level of Mendelian units that the forces of evolution operate, and hence it is imperative to study microevolution among such populations. Many earlier attempts have been made to understand microdifferentiation among such populations using traditional markers as well as other biological variables (Karve and Malhotra 1968;Basu 1969;Malhotra 1978a and1978b;Malhotra et al 1978;Reddy et al 1987Reddy et al , 1989Reddy et al , 1995Murty et al 1993;Sirajuddin et al 1994;Ramana et al 1996). However, the resolving power of such markers is expected to be low and unreliable, especially at the level of endogamous subcastes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discordance in the pattern of population relationships based on dermatoglyphics and other biological variables, particularly serological and anthropometric, appears to be a rule rather than an exception (see Plato 1970;Chai 1972;Neel et al 1974;Crawford et al 1976;Jantz and Chopra 1983;Reddy et al 1987;Reddy et al 2000). Dermatoglyphic variables are considered to undergo slow rates of evolutionary change, hence are presumably less useful in depicting local level variations even at the level of different castes and tribes within a region (Rothhammer et al 1977;Rudan 1978;Jantz and Hawkinson 1979;Giles 1981a, 1981b;Reddy and Reddy 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there is a pressing need to understand this traditional population structure and study its role in shaping human biological diversity in India. In the past, many attempts have been made to understand the process of microdifferentiation among subdivided populations using traditional genetic markers (blood groups, red cell enzymes, and serum proteins) and other biological variables (Karve and Malhotra 1968;Basu 1969;Malhotra 1978aMalhotra , 1978bMalhotra et al 1978;Reddy and Chopra 1999;Reddy et al 1987Reddy et al , 1989Reddy et al , 1995Reddy et al , 2000Murty et al 1993;Sirajuddin et al 1994;Ramana et al 1996). However, with the realization that molecular genetic markers help answer questions pertaining to microevolution more precisely, and particularly after the development of rapid screening techniques using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the focus has turned towards using these markers for resolving questions of both short-and long-term evolution of human populations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%