Essentials of Bioinformatics, Volume I 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-02634-9_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological 3D Structural Databases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To be consistent with DeepDTA ( Öztürk et al , 2018 ), we evaluate our model on two benchmarks, Davis ( Davis et al , 2011 ) and KIBA ( Tang et al , 2014 ). Additionally, we convert the data of a new 3D dataset, sc-PDB ( Gaber et al , 2019 ), into the sequence format to evaluate the performance of the proposed method for BR prediction. The statistics for the three datasets are shown in Table 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To be consistent with DeepDTA ( Öztürk et al , 2018 ), we evaluate our model on two benchmarks, Davis ( Davis et al , 2011 ) and KIBA ( Tang et al , 2014 ). Additionally, we convert the data of a new 3D dataset, sc-PDB ( Gaber et al , 2019 ), into the sequence format to evaluate the performance of the proposed method for BR prediction. The statistics for the three datasets are shown in Table 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, MTR-DTA still performs better than the others. Besides, we supply a new dataset, sc-PDB ( Gaber et al , 2019 ), that includes actual BR information, to evaluate these models in predicting unseen drug–target BRs with the scale S =15. The experimental results also confirm that the performance of a BR prediction model with supervised learning is more reliable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To verify the effectiveness of our model and to facilitate comparative analysis with other models, we use two famous benchmark datasets, Davis [34] and KIBA [6]. Furthermore, to evaluate the performance of our model in predicting drug-target BR, we use the sc-PDB dataset [35]. The Davis dataset contains 30056 interactions between 68 drugs and 442 targets.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%