2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2016.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biologic and clinical aspects of integration of different bone substitutes in oral surgery: a literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
65
0
18

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
65
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the use of this material has disadvantages: the need for an additional surgical site, the more invasive procedure, the quantitative limit of bone that can be harvested from the donor site, and the morbidity for the patient [4, 16, 30]. For this reason, different materials have been proposed as possible alternatives, such as allografts [31] and xenografts [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, the use of this material has disadvantages: the need for an additional surgical site, the more invasive procedure, the quantitative limit of bone that can be harvested from the donor site, and the morbidity for the patient [4, 16, 30]. For this reason, different materials have been proposed as possible alternatives, such as allografts [31] and xenografts [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fundamental properties that a synthetic material should possess are biocompatibility, bioresorbability, and the presence of an architecture/structure similar to that of natural bone: the internal geometry of the biomaterial is, in fact, crucial for the biological behaviour and for promoting new bone formation [1619, 35]. The modern synthetic porous scaffolds possess a controlled, high porosity and they have a honeycomb structure with several interconnections between different pores [1619]. This peculiar architecture has proven to be able to stimulate differentiation of mesenchymal cells into functional osteoblasts and finally to promote new bone apposition [1619].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The only material who gives an osteoconduction, osteoinduction and osteogenics properties is the autologous bone [4]. However, employed this bone, means a large surgery to pull a donor from chin, mandibular oblique line and other donor sites, provoking pain, stress and delayed surgery for the patient [5]. In this way platelet rich in fibrin (PRF) is an optimal autologous biological matrix that offer growing factors to be present in a wound healing provoking a rapid bone regeneration and repair [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%