2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioleaching of chalcopyrite by moderately thermophilic microorganisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the inverse scan, C1 and C2 may be attributed to the reaction of cupric ions with chalcopyrite, CuS or elemental sulfur, producing chalcocite (Qin et al, 2013). When the potential value was lower than −0.3 V, peaks C3 and C4 were observed.…”
Section: Voltammetric and Potentiodynamic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the inverse scan, C1 and C2 may be attributed to the reaction of cupric ions with chalcopyrite, CuS or elemental sulfur, producing chalcocite (Qin et al, 2013). When the potential value was lower than −0.3 V, peaks C3 and C4 were observed.…”
Section: Voltammetric and Potentiodynamic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Hence, the effects of pyrite and bornite on bioleaching of chalcopyrite cannot be ignored. Some researchers (Gu et al, 2013;Liang et al, 2011;Majuste et al, 2012;Qin et al, 2013;Zhao et al, 2015a) have reported that chalcopyrite can be reduced to bornite at the initial stage of bioleaching and this first step was also a http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.07.003 0960-8524/Ó 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. rate-limiting step.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Note that diffusion mechanisms characterized with EIS measurements have been only reported for A. ferrooxidans and SM surface systems (i.e. cells, secondary compounds), which were attributed to specific requirements of Fe(II)/Fe(III) species (Bevilaqua et al, 2004(Bevilaqua et al, , 2009Liu et al, 2011), whereby this process is not required for SOM A. thiooxidans and therefore, instead, it requires direct cell attachment to SM surface to obtain its energy source throughout enzymatic mechanisms to attack i.e., S n 2− /S 0 phases (Rohwerder et al, 2003;Devasia and Natarajan, 2010). Table 5 summarizes the parameters obtained from the fits to EIS data.…”
Section: Total Amount and Size Of Proteins In Biofilmsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is worthile mentioning that prior to this EQ, additional EQs involving diffusive processes (i.e. solid-diffusion, Warburg type impedance) were tried, as indicated by Bevilaqua et al (2004Bevilaqua et al ( , 2009) to describe SM and leaching bacteria (i.e. A. ferrooxidans) interactions.…”
Section: Total Amount and Size Of Proteins In Biofilmsmentioning
confidence: 99%