1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1994.tb04874.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biokinematic differences between riding horses judged as good and poor at the trot

Abstract: Summary The trotting gait of 4 approved Swedish Warmblood stallions with a mean gait score ≥8.67 (maximum score = 10) at official performance tests and 4 horses with poor gaits (mean gait score ≤6.5) was recorded by high speed film (250 frames/s). Angular patterns and hoof trajectories of the left fore and hind limbs were analysed and presented as mean and standard deviation curves. The good horses had longer stride duration (p<0.001) and larger positive diagonal advanced placement (p<0.01). The swing phase re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It changed in the same way during bilateral and unilateral lameness (4). Similarly, horses on a treadmill place their forelimbs earlier than overground (3) and dressage horses with lower trotting quality show the same difference compared to good horses (7). Therefore, an advanced placement of the hind limbs during the trot seems to be a sign of confidence and an ability of high locomotor performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It changed in the same way during bilateral and unilateral lameness (4). Similarly, horses on a treadmill place their forelimbs earlier than overground (3) and dressage horses with lower trotting quality show the same difference compared to good horses (7). Therefore, an advanced placement of the hind limbs during the trot seems to be a sign of confidence and an ability of high locomotor performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It is well known that dressage horses have a high incidence of suspensory ligament problems (Dyson 2007, Murray et al 2006, Trump et al 2014. Since the SL is maximally loaded due to maximal extension of the fetlock joint, when during trot only one fore and hind limb is on the ground, the risk of SL desmitis may increase (Holmstrom et al 1994, Walker et al 2013. As shown by Riemersma et al, the mean maximal strain and mean maximal load in walk and trot is higher in the SL compared to the SDFT (Holmstrom et al 1994, Riemersma et al 1996, Walker et al 2013 The degree of lameness in horses with PSD in a fore-or hindlimb varies greatly (Dyson 2007, Genovese et al 2011, Gibson et al 2002.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection process for sporting purposes has been mainly based on subjective criteria although studies of Grant [17], Back et al [3,4], and Holmström et al [21] have defined objective locomotion characteristics for performance prediction. Much has been written during the last two decades on basic stride characteristics, such as temporal, linear and angular variables, in different gaits and sport situations by Galisteo et al [14,15], Clayton [9,10] and Miró et al [23], and on coordination of joints within the equine fore and hind limbs by Back et al [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%