2021
DOI: 10.1039/d1ta05262d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioinspired, nucleobase-driven, highly resilient, and fast-responsive antifreeze ionic conductive hydrogels for durable pressure and strain sensors

Abstract: Conductive hydrogels have drawn tremendous attention in flexible devices, soft robotics, and artificial intelligence. The integration of synergistic characteristics of reliable resilience, high strain sensitivity, and excellent mechanical properties is...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure a shows the comparison of our work to various references in terms of stretchability versus response time. [ 6,9,21,23,38,40,54–64 ] It is worth noting that our PAM/PBA‐IL3/CNF2 hydrogel sensor simultaneously exhibits higher intrinsic stretchability (up to 1810 ± 38%) and a fast response time (195 ms) than other reported ICHs. In addition, as shown in Figure 8b, compared with recently reported gel‐based strain sensors, [ 4,12,21,38,55,65,66 ] most procedures for constructing such sensors often have restricted functionalities, such as their conductivity, stretchability, gauge factor, self‐healing, adhesion, transparency, and water retention.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Figure a shows the comparison of our work to various references in terms of stretchability versus response time. [ 6,9,21,23,38,40,54–64 ] It is worth noting that our PAM/PBA‐IL3/CNF2 hydrogel sensor simultaneously exhibits higher intrinsic stretchability (up to 1810 ± 38%) and a fast response time (195 ms) than other reported ICHs. In addition, as shown in Figure 8b, compared with recently reported gel‐based strain sensors, [ 4,12,21,38,55,65,66 ] most procedures for constructing such sensors often have restricted functionalities, such as their conductivity, stretchability, gauge factor, self‐healing, adhesion, transparency, and water retention.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[ 6,9,21,23,38,40,54–64 ] It is worth noting that our PAM/PBA‐IL3/CNF2 hydrogel sensor simultaneously exhibits higher intrinsic stretchability (up to 1810 ± 38%) and a fast response time (195 ms) than other reported ICHs. In addition, as shown in Figure 8b, compared with recently reported gel‐based strain sensors, [ 4,12,21,38,55,65,66 ] most procedures for constructing such sensors often have restricted functionalities, such as their conductivity, stretchability, gauge factor, self‐healing, adhesion, transparency, and water retention. However, our hydrogel‐based sensors prepared by a facile one‐step approach clearly display excellent comprehensive merits: i) ingenious structural design and crosslinking without the use of complicated components, ii) a fine trade‐off between electrical and mechanical performance, and iii) favorable adhesion, self‐healing property, transparency, and water retention.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Poly(acrylamide-N-acryloyl-2-glycine)/sodium dodecyl sulfate/LiCl [97 reported ones. Meanwhile, the Gel-CG6 hydrogel strain sensor exhibits good self-healing performance, adhesive ability, conductivity, and biocompatibility.…”
Section: Sensing Applications Of Multi-network Hydrogelmentioning
confidence: 99%