2007
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioinformatic identification of novel putative photoreceptor specific cis-elements

Abstract: Background: Cell specific gene expression is largely regulated by different combinations of transcription factors that bind cis-elements in the upstream promoter sequence. However, experimental detection of cis-elements is difficult, expensive, and time-consuming. This provides a motivation for developing bioinformatic methods to identify cis-elements that could prioritize future experimental studies. Here, we use motif discovery algorithms to predict transcription factor binding sites involved in regulating t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To address this possibility, we searched the MDM2 P1 and P2 promoters for cone-specific control elements that were identified in an unbiased bioinformatics analysis (Danko et al, 2007). This revealed an element in the human but not mouse P2 promoter that matched a cone-specific RXR-like element (Danko et al, 2007) at each of six invariant positions, and matched the consensus RXRγ homodimer binding site (Dowhan et al, 1994) at 14 of 15 positions (Figure 7A). We then examined whether this human-specific element promotes MDM2 expression, using an MDM2-P2-Luc reporter gene and a mutant ΔRXR version that had two human-to-mouse nucleotide substitutions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To address this possibility, we searched the MDM2 P1 and P2 promoters for cone-specific control elements that were identified in an unbiased bioinformatics analysis (Danko et al, 2007). This revealed an element in the human but not mouse P2 promoter that matched a cone-specific RXR-like element (Danko et al, 2007) at each of six invariant positions, and matched the consensus RXRγ homodimer binding site (Dowhan et al, 1994) at 14 of 15 positions (Figure 7A). We then examined whether this human-specific element promotes MDM2 expression, using an MDM2-P2-Luc reporter gene and a mutant ΔRXR version that had two human-to-mouse nucleotide substitutions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(A) A human MDM2 P2 promoter element (second row) with identity to a cone-specific RXR element (Danko et al, 2007) at each of six invariant positions (top row, underlined), and identity to the consensus RXRγ homodimer binding site at 14 of 15 positions (third row, shaded, from Table 1 of Dowhan et al, 1994), but differing from murine sequences (fifth row, aligned as in Figure S13). Human-to-mouse substitutions in P2-Luc-ΔRXR (fourth row) are underlined.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used two strategies to analyze the core promoter region of co-regulated genes. First, the motif discovery algorithm Iterative Alignment/Modular Motif Selection (IAMMS) [ 24 ] was used to identify putative regulatory sites de novo . Second, we searched for an enrichment of known regulatory motifs using the gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) tools [ 25 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upstream region of genes in the contractile, energy generation, and protein translation sets were scanned against the background promoter set using IAMMS, as described previously [ 24 ]. In the initial stage, IAMMS detected 10,240, 19,665, and 16,719 motifs to test for enrichment in the contractile, energy, and translation promoter groups, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The availability of these datasets has resulted in more efforts at generating a GRN for retinal development than for any other ocular component 148–154. The use of motif discovery algorithms has led to the prediction of several rod‐ and cone‐specific CREs and some of these have been experimentally validated 155. Specifically, promoters of cone‐expressed genes are found to contain an enrichment of predicted motifs for Rx and engrailed family members, whereas promoters of rod‐expressed genes are found to contain predicted interleukin 6 (IL‐6) effector motifs.…”
Section: Systems‐level Analyses Of Eye Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%