2012
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m111.326207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioinformatic and Mutational Analysis of Channelrhodopsin-2 Protein Cation-conducting Pathway

Abstract: Background: ChR2 is a light-gated ion channel allowing fast non-invasive control of cell membrane potential. Results: We combined bioinformatic modeling and electrophysiology to infer structure/function details on ChR2. Conclusion: We show a complete structural model of the channel, describe the ion-conducting pathway and identify key residues involved in ionic permeability and in photoactivation. Significance: These results expand our knowledge on the structural determinants of ChR2.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
39
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Replacement of E3 [hydrogen-bonded to Ser 63 and Asn 258 forming the central gate (86, 87); ChR2 residue numbering] had the largest impact. Replacement of inner-gate His 134 /E2 or access-channel E4/E5 also reduced H conductance (62, 64, 88, 89). Further support for this proton-wire hypothesis is derived from cryptophyte anion-conducting ChRs (90), which show reduced H + conductance with fewer helix-2 glutamates (90); interestingly, these glutamates have little influence on kinetics, and only mutation of E1 decelerates closing (88, 91).…”
Section: Selectivity Variantsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Replacement of E3 [hydrogen-bonded to Ser 63 and Asn 258 forming the central gate (86, 87); ChR2 residue numbering] had the largest impact. Replacement of inner-gate His 134 /E2 or access-channel E4/E5 also reduced H conductance (62, 64, 88, 89). Further support for this proton-wire hypothesis is derived from cryptophyte anion-conducting ChRs (90), which show reduced H + conductance with fewer helix-2 glutamates (90); interestingly, these glutamates have little influence on kinetics, and only mutation of E1 decelerates closing (88, 91).…”
Section: Selectivity Variantsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In MD simulations, the hydrophilic pore attracts water from the extracellular bulk phase; this so-called access channel with a diameter of 8 Å is framed by side chains of polar residues including the essential R120 and the polar E4 and E5 (55,78). Near the RSBH + , the water distribution is discontinuous, and the channel is blocked by S63, E3, and N258, which are interconnected by several hydrogen bonds (referred to as the central gate, see Figure 1e) ( restriction site (referred to as the inner gate, see Figure 1d ) is given by Y70 in combination with the hydrophilic cluster of E1 and E2 and their hydrogen-bonding partners H134 and R268, which are located on H3 and H7, respectively.…”
Section: Ion Permeation Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most importantly, ChR2 S63, E90, and N258 of the central gate (Figure 1e) are critical determinants. The introduction of a second negative charge into the central gate region, as, for example, in ChR2 S63D or N258D, favors the transport of divalent cations (31,55). Mutations of ChR2 E90 result in different ion selectivities depending on the character of the introduced residue.…”
Section: Putative Selectivity Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1), implicated in control of ion selectivity in CrChR2 (63)(64)(65), and Ser-136, which regulates the size of the channel pore (66). Of three positively charged residues that form a vestibule on the extracellular side of the channel pore in C1C2 (43), Lys-154 is substituted with Val in PsChR.…”
Section: Namentioning
confidence: 99%