2023
DOI: 10.1111/aas.14180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioimpedance as a measure of fluids in patients with septic shock. A prospective observational study

Abstract: Background: Septic shock is often treated with aggressive fluid resuscitation leading to profound fluid overload. The assessment of fluid status relies on suboptimal measures making treatment difficult. Bioelectrical impedance analysis is an alternative but the validity is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the validity of bioelectrical impedance analysis for fluid measures in patients with septic shock.Methods: Single-center, prospective observational cohort study. We included adult ICU patients … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most likely reason for this is the lack of patient-related factors in the algorithms, but also an increased understanding of factors that lead to the substantial internal variation that we have previously described. 18 Our study suggests that, if the variations in internal validity could be managed, the use of change in bioimpedance could be further developed and potentially help identify patients with a risk of organ failure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most likely reason for this is the lack of patient-related factors in the algorithms, but also an increased understanding of factors that lead to the substantial internal variation that we have previously described. 18 Our study suggests that, if the variations in internal validity could be managed, the use of change in bioimpedance could be further developed and potentially help identify patients with a risk of organ failure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The internal validity and efficacy of the 2 devices were examined in another study using the same population. 18…”
Section: Design and Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent (systematic) reviews have pointed towards the issues in the validation of BIA-derived parameters against the gold standard, as the calculation of fluid composition and cumulative fluid balance is not without error or bias in critically ill patients [19,22,30]. Therefore it was not surprising that bioelectrical impedance analysis had no systematic errors or bias, but wide limits of agreement [50]. On the other hand changes in bioimpedance were correlated with the duration of overall organ failure, circulatory failure, and fluid status.…”
Section: Importance Of Fluid Overload and Intra-abdominal Hypertensionmentioning
confidence: 99%