2017
DOI: 10.1111/jbi.12973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biogeographical evidence for common vicariance and rare dispersal in a southern Appalachian harvestman (Sabaconidae, Sabacon cavicolens)

Abstract: Aim Species or higher taxa that are obviously dispersal‐limited, but which occupy large geographical distributions, represent a biogeographical paradox. Dispersal must have happened, likely under special and infrequent environmental conditions, but details have been lost to history. The overarching goal of our research is to understand the details of a ‘common vicariance, rare dispersal’ biogeographical history in a widespread but habitat‐specialized harvestman species (Sabacon cavicolens) with a southern Appa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tributaries of the Little Colorado River bisect populations within the Central clade, with identical haplotypes found on each side. Thus, rivers may indeed act as barriers to gene flow to tarantulas at lower elevations, supporting a “riverine barrier hypothesis” as proposed for studies on Opiliones (Hedin & McCormack, 2017; Thomas & Hedin, 2008). At higher elevations on the plateau, however, rivers do not significantly impede gene flow, like the “leaky” barrier scenario used to recently describe the nearby lower Colorado River (Dolby, Dorsey, & Graham, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Tributaries of the Little Colorado River bisect populations within the Central clade, with identical haplotypes found on each side. Thus, rivers may indeed act as barriers to gene flow to tarantulas at lower elevations, supporting a “riverine barrier hypothesis” as proposed for studies on Opiliones (Hedin & McCormack, 2017; Thomas & Hedin, 2008). At higher elevations on the plateau, however, rivers do not significantly impede gene flow, like the “leaky” barrier scenario used to recently describe the nearby lower Colorado River (Dolby, Dorsey, & Graham, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…For example, studies implementing Templeton-Crandall-Sing parsimony and inferring demographic processes using nested clade analysis in millipedes, have generated hypotheses useful for conservation and understanding phylogeographic patterns ( Zigler, Loria & Lewis, 2011 ; Marek & Bond, 2009 ). However, in very old groups of non-mobile invertebrates, the technique of using geographical proximity is more challenging ( Hedin & McCormack, 2017 ; Hendrixson & Bond, 2007 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the biodiversity encompassed by these mountains, wingless and low-mobility animals such as millipedes, harvestmen, snails, and salamanders are tightly coupled to their habitat. As a result of its complex topography, varied edaphic qualities, and ancient origins, the Appalachian Mountains have fostered the isolation and diversification of these low-mobility groups resulting in high species diversity in relatively small geographic areas ( Marek, 2010 ; Hedin & McCormack, 2017 ). This is particularly the case for millipedes, and for the past 10–20 million years the group has had the opportunity to diversify in the Appalachian region as a result of its stable mesic environment, calcareous geology (millipedes biomineralize calcium carbonate into their cuticle), and historical contingency ( Briggs, Plint & Pickerill, 1984 ; Shear & Selden, 1995 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, biogeographic distributions that cannot be related to ecology or explained by dispersal or vicariance offer enigmatic puzzles that require additional investigation (e.g. [ 8 , 9 ]). Biogeographic knowledge can be further used in applied research, such as assessments of taxonomy and improving conservation legislation [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%