1983
DOI: 10.2307/3670592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biogeographic Relationships of Pocket Gophers in Southeastern Colorado

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The current distribution is the result of competing thermal needs of the species and the current temperature regiment enforced by the karyotypic differences of the species. This hypothesis seems plausible because ecotonal changes, which are maintained by the climate, appear to be a strong limiting factor in species distributions at contact zones (Smith 1965;Moulton et al 1983;Bull 1991;Frey 1992;Harrison 1993;Searle 1993;Shaw et al 1993;Hewitt 2000Hewitt , 2001. However, we know of no environmental barriers associated with the contact zone of Blarina in our study area, as was reported in Nebraska (Benedict 1999b).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 40%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current distribution is the result of competing thermal needs of the species and the current temperature regiment enforced by the karyotypic differences of the species. This hypothesis seems plausible because ecotonal changes, which are maintained by the climate, appear to be a strong limiting factor in species distributions at contact zones (Smith 1965;Moulton et al 1983;Bull 1991;Frey 1992;Harrison 1993;Searle 1993;Shaw et al 1993;Hewitt 2000Hewitt , 2001. However, we know of no environmental barriers associated with the contact zone of Blarina in our study area, as was reported in Nebraska (Benedict 1999b).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…This definition allows for gene flow between the groups but only at the limit of each species' geographic range, which can lead to a narrow band of hybridization or hybrid zone (Mallet 2005). Thereby, the distributional relationship was determined to be parapatric if the ranges of the species abutted but did not overlap (Futuyma and Mayer 1980;Key 1981;Moulton et al 1983;Bull 1991;Mallet 2005). The distributional relationship was determined to be sympatric if the ranges significantly overlapped.…”
Section: Relationship In Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High clay and silt content as well as soil moisture may be important variables to pocket gopher occupancy because these factors reduce the aeration of the soil and gas exchange with the external environment (Moulton et al, 1983). Our findings reveal that Ozark pocket gophers tend to be more prevalent in loamy sand soils.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%