Manual of Environmental Microbiology 2007
DOI: 10.1128/9781555815882.ch68
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biogeochemistry of Aquifer Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of different diversity and development of microbial communities that depend on the granulometric and textural characteristics of the media highlights the need to analyze the samples of different granulometries (Albrechtsen, 1994 andHurst et al, 2002). Further down, microbial diversity increases and there is greater variability depending on the predominant lithology and the geochemical characteristics (Cozzarelli and Weiss, 2007). Thus, the microbial diversity is greater and the communities are often more developed where fine granulometry levels predominate (silt and clay, as in the case of samples M4 and M5).…”
Section: Microbial Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of different diversity and development of microbial communities that depend on the granulometric and textural characteristics of the media highlights the need to analyze the samples of different granulometries (Albrechtsen, 1994 andHurst et al, 2002). Further down, microbial diversity increases and there is greater variability depending on the predominant lithology and the geochemical characteristics (Cozzarelli and Weiss, 2007). Thus, the microbial diversity is greater and the communities are often more developed where fine granulometry levels predominate (silt and clay, as in the case of samples M4 and M5).…”
Section: Microbial Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aquifers are commonly segmented into geochemical zones within which the activity of a single functional group, such as the sulfate reducers or iron reducers, is thought to predominate [ Chapelle , 2001; Cozzarelli and Weiss , 2007]. Many researchers have attributed this apparent segregation to competitive exclusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research on soils experiencing fluctuating redox conditions and active iron cycling have shown they frequently lack ‘typical’ Fe(III)-respiring bacteria (65), being outcompeted by sulfate respiration (66). Despite Fe(III) being a more thermodynamically favourable electron acceptor it is commonly acknowledged that sulfate respiration often outcompetes Fe(III) respiration in both high and low sulfate environments (66, 67). High levels of sulfate reduction in low-sulfate environments, akin to the LFLS trenches, has been previously observed to occur in the presence of crystalline Fe(III) oxyhydroxides that partially re-oxidise sulfide generated by SRB to elemental sulfur (67).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%