2016
DOI: 10.5194/acp-16-5191-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biogenic, anthropogenic and sea salt sulfate size-segregated aerosols in the Arctic summer

Abstract: Abstract. Size-segregated aerosol sulfate concentrations were measured on board the Canadian Coast Guard Ship (CCGS) Amundsen in the Arctic during July 2014. The objective of this study was to utilize the isotopic composition of sulfate to address the contribution of anthropogenic and biogenic sources of aerosols to the growth of the different aerosol size fractions in the Arctic atmosphere. Non-seasalt sulfate is divided into biogenic and anthropogenic sulfate using stable isotope apportionment techniques. A … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
54
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
7
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sea ice is an organic sulphur-rich environment because ice algae generally contain high intracellular levels of DMSP for osmoregulation and cryoprotection 22 . Even though surface-ocean DMS and chlorophyll a concentrations are typically not correlated over large spatial and temporal scales, recent studies suggest that the variability in the DMS mixing ratios in Svalbard air may be explained by the variability in the chlorophyll a concentration in the vicinity of the islands 35, 37, 38 .
Figure 3Average daily concentrations of selected chemical tracers for each aerosol category.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sea ice is an organic sulphur-rich environment because ice algae generally contain high intracellular levels of DMSP for osmoregulation and cryoprotection 22 . Even though surface-ocean DMS and chlorophyll a concentrations are typically not correlated over large spatial and temporal scales, recent studies suggest that the variability in the DMS mixing ratios in Svalbard air may be explained by the variability in the chlorophyll a concentration in the vicinity of the islands 35, 37, 38 .
Figure 3Average daily concentrations of selected chemical tracers for each aerosol category.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical composition of size-segregated aerosol particles was recently measured in the Arctic atmosphere during summer months. More than 60 % of the aerosol particles having a diameter < 0.49 µm was found to be derived from biogenic SO 2− 4 (Ghahremaninezhad et al, 2016). According to a study based on an aerosol microphysics box model (Chang et al, 2011), the atmospheric DMS mixing ratios observed during phytoplankton bloom periods in our study were sufficiently high for the formation of ultrafine aerosol particles, when background particle concentrations are low (i.e., DMS mixing ratio > 100 pptv; condensation sink < 7.0 m −2 ) (Fig.…”
Section: Aerosol Particles Formed During Periods Of Arctic Haze (Aprimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From DMS concentrations in both the surface ocean and in the atmosphere just above the ocean surface (median DMS(g) of 186 pptv), Mungall et al (2016) estimated the air-sea DMS(g) flux as ranging from 0.02-12 µmol m −2 d −1 in July 2014 in the same location as the present measurements (Lancaster Sound). For the same campaign, Ghahremaninezhad et al (2016) showed that the dominant source for fine aerosol and SO 2 measured onboard the Amundsen at the same location and about 30 m above the ocean's surface was biogenic sulfur, arising from DMS(g) oxidation. Atmospheric oxidation of DMS(g) is expected to proceed more readily in the summertime Arctic atmosphere than in spring, due to higher temperatures and more sunlight.…”
Section: Flexpart-ecmwfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GEOS-Chem model has been extensively applied to study the Arctic atmosphere, with regard to aerosol acidity (Wentworth et al, 2016;Fisher et al, 2011), carbonaceous aerosol , aerosol number (Leaitch et al, 2013;Croft et al, 2016a, b), aerosol absorption (Breider et al, 2014), mercury (Fisher et al, 2012) and recently surface-layer DMS(g) (Mungall et al, 2016).…”
Section: Model Description 221 Geos-chem Chemical Transport Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%