Biofuel Economics in a Setting of Multiple Objectives & Unintended Consequences

Abstract

SummaryThis paper examines biofuels from an economic perspective and evaluates the merits of promoting biofuel production in the context of the policies' multiple objectives, life-cycle implications, pecuniary externalities, and other unintended consequences. The policy goals most often cited are to reduce fossil fuel use and to lower greenhouse gas emissions. But the presence of multiple objectives and various indirect effects complicates normative evaluation. To address some of these complicating factors, we look at several combinations of policy alternatives that achieve the same set of incremental gains along the two primary targeted policy dimensions, making it possible to compare the costs and cost-effectiveness of each combination of policies. For example, when this approach is applied to U.S.-produced biofuels, they are found to be 14 to 31 times as costly as alternatives like raising the gas tax or promoting energy efficiency improvements. The analysis also finds the scale of the potential contributions of biofuels to be extremely small in both the U.S. and EU. Mandated U.S. corn ethanol production for 2025 reduces U.S. petroleum input use by 1.75%, and would have negligible net effects on CO2 emissions; and although EU imports of Brazilian ethanol may look better given the high costs of other alternatives, this option is equivalent, at most, to a 1.20% reduction in EU gasoline consumption.

Green Renewable Energy – Risk Need to Be Tackled in Going Green for Air Transportation

“…Biofuel industry also following the same business activity as the biofuel producers face a few main limitations towards mass production, like limited know-how and confirmed data, lack of land and resources, also competition for other development like food production and nonenergy uses. [20] Discussion Aviation industries and safety cannot be separated, due to the standard and benchmark of quality of jet fuel that must be complied and oblige by the aviation industries, such as risks mentioned and discuss above. The researcher, practitioner and the policy maker, need to ensure these characteristics to be proper measure and handling in guarantee the application of biojet fuel for aviation specification is successful.…”

Bioenergy, Food Security and Poverty Reduction: Mitigating Tradeoffs and Promoting Synergies Along the Water-Energy-Food Security Nexus

“…Environmental sustainability is here used to refer to both environmental friendliness of bioenergy use and sustainable use of scarce natural resources. There are two criteria in evaluating the net impact of bioenergy on the carbon balance: (i) the amount of CO 2 absorbed by energy plants through photosynthesis, and (ii) CO 2 emission in the entire life cycle of bioenergy (production, processing and transportation of biomass feedstock, and consumption) (Jaeger andEgelkraut 2011, Antikainen et al 2007). …”

Biofuels: policies and impacts

“…As highlighted by Jaeger and Egelkraut (2011), significant increase in the production of biofuels may cause many social and economic externalities in the form of feedback effects and other unintended consequences that impose additional costs on the society. This may be the case to which a general warning of the theory of second-best applies.…”