2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.08.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioflocculation management through high-rate contact-stabilization: A promising technology to recover organic carbon from low-strength wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This would ensure the conversion of the largest possible portion of soluble biodegradable COD into biomass. Recent research efforts have attempted to promote the contact stabilization process as the most promising AS scheme for maximum sludge generation . Unfortunately, the evaluation provided in this study clearly proved the opposite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This would ensure the conversion of the largest possible portion of soluble biodegradable COD into biomass. Recent research efforts have attempted to promote the contact stabilization process as the most promising AS scheme for maximum sludge generation . Unfortunately, the evaluation provided in this study clearly proved the opposite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Selected studies could be differentiated into two groups in terms of the adopted AS configurations. The first group of studies is of high‐rate systems reliant on gravity settling . These studies tested the performance of CAS systems, high‐rate contact stabilization systems (HiCS), high‐rate AS systems (HiCAS) and plug flow systems, mostly for promoting high‐rate contact stabilization as the ideal/novel process most suited for maximum energy conservation in sludge.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…P XI = QX I (26) or, based on 1 kg COD = 0.9 kg TSS: 36 P XT (TSS) = P XT 0.9 kg TSS kg COD (27) 9 Calculate M XH and M XT (kg cell COD) and M XT (kg cell COD; kg TSS) from -…”
Section: Design Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recovery rate calculated as 63% when the SFMBR was operated at sludge age of 1.0 d was 1.4 times higher than the high rate activated sludge process. 26 Recently a number of studies also promoted the high rate CS as a process alternative for maximum recovery of energy, although the interpretation of available experimental results to justify their claim was highly debatable, 27,28 mainly because excessive substrate and biomass escape in the effluent were not properly accounted for in COD mass balance. This issue is discussed in sufficient detail in Orhon et al 29 Despite the pioneering role in the development of the activated sludge process, the CS modification did not receive the research effort it deserved; it certainly did not benefit from the resources of multi-component modelling concepts to elucidate the major mechanisms involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%