2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10499-016-9983-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biofloc management with different flow rates for solids removal in the Litopenaeus vannamei BFT culture system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The TSS values were kept close to 500 mg/L (Cohen, Samocha, Fox, Gandy, & Lawrence, 2005; Samocha et al, 2007). Clarifiers mounted in a 1,000‐L plastic water box (settling chamber) with a central pipe with a 300 mm diameter and a 700 mm height at the center of the box to reduce turbulence were used when the TSS values reached 500 mg/L, following the clarification process described by Gaona, Serra, Furtado, Poersch, and Wasielesky (2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TSS values were kept close to 500 mg/L (Cohen, Samocha, Fox, Gandy, & Lawrence, 2005; Samocha et al, 2007). Clarifiers mounted in a 1,000‐L plastic water box (settling chamber) with a central pipe with a 300 mm diameter and a 700 mm height at the center of the box to reduce turbulence were used when the TSS values reached 500 mg/L, following the clarification process described by Gaona, Serra, Furtado, Poersch, and Wasielesky (2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that study, the larger and smaller settling chambers were 3.4% and 1.5%, respectively, of the culture tank volume. In another study, no significant difference was detected in solids DM removed when two influent flow rates into 797‐L settling chambers (2.3% of tank volume) were tested in a shrimp biofloc system, where HRTs were 12 and 24 min (8.9‐ and 17.8‐h tank turnover times, respectively; Gaona et al 2016). No significant difference was detected for solids removal from Channel Catfish biofloc production tanks by settling chambers (0.8% of tank volume) that were operated with a 40‐ or 127‐min HRT (3.7‐ and 11.8‐d tank turnover times, respectively; Green et al 2019b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More solids are produced in a heterotrophic-based biofloc production system, where organic carbon is added to stimulate bacterial immobilization of excreted feed nitrogen, than in a chemoautotrophic (nitrification)-based biofloc production system (Ebeling et al 2006;Ray and Lotz 2014). Left unchecked, TSS concentrations of 2,000 mg/L or higher were reported for Channel Catfish Ictalurus punctatus and whiteleg shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (hereafter, "shrimp") biofloc production systems (Green et al 2014;Gaona et al 2016). Results of published studies suggest that feed consumption is constrained at high TSS concentrations in Channel Catfish, sunshine bass (female White Bass Morone chrysops × male Striped Bass M. saxatilis), and shrimp biofloc production systems (Ray et al 2010(Ray et al , 2011Schveitzer et al 2013;Green et al 2014Green et al , 2018.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Biofloc technology (BFT) is a recirculating aquaculture system that controls the level of inorganic nitrogenous compounds in cultivating tanks or ponds based on the ability of suspended microbial flocs (i.e., bioflocs) to assimilate the nitrogen into cellular biomass or to transform the nitrogen into a less toxic form 3 . In addition to the effective control of ammonia, an important advantage of BFT systems compared with nitrifying and denitrifying biofilter processes is the ability to recycle unused protein in feeds by means of biofloc consumption by cultured animals 4 . Consumption of bioflocs improves digestive and antioxidant enzyme activities and increases the immune response in different economically important species, such as tilapia, white shrimp, and crayfish 5‐7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%