Abstract:Microbial biofilms are communities of aggregated microbial cells embedded in a self-produced matrix of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). Biofilms are recalcitrant to extreme environments, and can protect microorganisms from ultraviolet (UV) radiation, extreme temperature, extreme pH, high salinity, high pressure, poor nutrients, antibiotics, etc., by acting as “protective clothing”. In recent years, research works on biofilms have been mainly focused on biofilm-associated infections and strategies for … Show more
“…For example, in Deinococcus geothermalis, biofilm formation has been linked to an increased desiccation resistance, although it has also been linked to a decrease in UV resistance due to the photodissociation of water molecules retained in the EPS matrix, leading to increased ROS concentrations (Frösler et al ., 2017). On the other hand, biofilm structures have also been described to protect against UV‐radiation due to physical shading (Yin et al ., 2019). Interestingly, several bacterial taxa displayed very similar profiles throughout time, suggesting an interdependence between these genera.…”
Solar panel surfaces can be colonized by microorganisms adapted to desiccation, temperature fluctuations and solar radiation. Although the taxonomic and functional composition of these communities has been studied, the microbial colonization process remains unclear. In the present work, we have monitored this microbial colonization process during 24 months by performing weekly measurements of the photovoltaic efficiency, carrying out 16S rRNA gene high-throughput sequencing, and studying the effect of antimicrobial compounds on the composition of the microbial biocenosis. This is the first time a long-term study of the colonization process of solar panels has been performed, and our results reveal that species richness and biodiversity exhibit seasonal fluctuations and that there is a trend towards an increase or decrease of specialist (solar panel-adapted) and generalist taxa, respectively. On the former, extremophilic bacterial genera Deinococcus, Hymenobacter and Roseomonas and fungal Neocatenulostroma, Symmetrospora and Sporobolomyces tended to dominate the biocenosis; whereas Lactobacillus sp or Stemphyllium exhibited a decreasing trend. This profile was deeply altered by washing the panels with chemical agents (Virkon), but this did not lead to an increase of the solar panels efficiency. Our results show that solar panels are extreme environments that force the selection of a particular microbial community.
“…For example, in Deinococcus geothermalis, biofilm formation has been linked to an increased desiccation resistance, although it has also been linked to a decrease in UV resistance due to the photodissociation of water molecules retained in the EPS matrix, leading to increased ROS concentrations (Frösler et al ., 2017). On the other hand, biofilm structures have also been described to protect against UV‐radiation due to physical shading (Yin et al ., 2019). Interestingly, several bacterial taxa displayed very similar profiles throughout time, suggesting an interdependence between these genera.…”
Solar panel surfaces can be colonized by microorganisms adapted to desiccation, temperature fluctuations and solar radiation. Although the taxonomic and functional composition of these communities has been studied, the microbial colonization process remains unclear. In the present work, we have monitored this microbial colonization process during 24 months by performing weekly measurements of the photovoltaic efficiency, carrying out 16S rRNA gene high-throughput sequencing, and studying the effect of antimicrobial compounds on the composition of the microbial biocenosis. This is the first time a long-term study of the colonization process of solar panels has been performed, and our results reveal that species richness and biodiversity exhibit seasonal fluctuations and that there is a trend towards an increase or decrease of specialist (solar panel-adapted) and generalist taxa, respectively. On the former, extremophilic bacterial genera Deinococcus, Hymenobacter and Roseomonas and fungal Neocatenulostroma, Symmetrospora and Sporobolomyces tended to dominate the biocenosis; whereas Lactobacillus sp or Stemphyllium exhibited a decreasing trend. This profile was deeply altered by washing the panels with chemical agents (Virkon), but this did not lead to an increase of the solar panels efficiency. Our results show that solar panels are extreme environments that force the selection of a particular microbial community.
“…In their work, of the 10 antibiotics tested, only gentamicin and ceftaroline were able to eradicate the biofilms. It has been reported that bacterial biofilms are also highly resistant to ultraviolet and heavy metals [ 54 ]. In addition to bacteria, fungi, especially Candida , are present in DFU biofilm-associated wound samples [ 55 ].…”
Foot infections are the main disabling complication in patients with diabetes mellitus. These infections can lead to lower-limb amputation, increasing mortality and decreasing the quality of life. Biofilm formation is an important pathophysiology step in diabetic foot ulcers (DFU)—it plays a main role in the disease progression and chronicity of the lesion, the development of antibiotic resistance, and makes wound healing difficult to treat. The main problem is the difficulty in distinguishing between infection and colonization in DFU. The bacteria present in DFU are organized into functionally equivalent pathogroups that allow for close interactions between the bacteria within the biofilm. Consequently, some bacterial species that alone would be considered non-pathogenic, or incapable of maintaining a chronic infection, could co-aggregate symbiotically in a pathogenic biofilm and act synergistically to cause a chronic infection. In this review, we discuss current knowledge on biofilm formation, its presence in DFU, how the diabetic environment affects biofilm formation and its regulation, and the clinical implications.
“…When a bacteria formed a biofilm, it promotes growth and survival, it becomes extremely difficult to be destroyed (Georgescu et al, 2016). Biofilm supports the colonization of bacteria, which is showing resistant to most antibiotics (Yin et al, 2019). Among bacterial pathogens, P. aeruginosa inherent resistance to antibiotics such as aminoglycosides, carbapenems, penicillins, ZANCO Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences 2020 quinolones and cephalosporins.…”
Section: Fritillaria Zagrica Stapf Is a Species Verymentioning
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is considered a resourceful pathogen; which has several essential virulence effectors such as exoenzyme, exotoxin and biofilm might help to it is infection. This study aimed to investigate the frequency of exoS gene, the determination of biofilm production and antimicrobial resistance among clinical samples of P. aeruginosa. In our study, 227 specimens of P. aeruginosa collected from different clinical specimens which were attending public hospitals in Erbil city. Antimicrobial resistance of samples identified by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. Through PCR virulence gene exoS was studied. Biofilm production measured by both Congo Red Agar (CRA) and tissue culture plate method (TCP). Among 227 clinical samples, 40 (17.6%) were positive for P. aeruginosa. Imipenem was showed most effective antibiotic 95% against P. aeruginosa. Incidence of exoS gene was 70% within the P. aeruginosa isolates. Moreover, around 75% of clinical samples produced biofilm and approximately 40% of them produced strong biofilm. Our study showed that the incidence of bla exoS gene and biofilm formation, which are common virulence factors in the clinical samples, especially in burn patients, and are a severe problem in the treatment of the patient.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.