Biofilm viscoelasticity and nutrient source location control biofilm growth rate, migration rate, and morphology in shear flow

Abstract

We present a numerical model to simulate the growth and deformation of a viscoelastic biofilm in shear flow under different nutrient conditions. The mechanical interaction between the biofilm and the fluid is computed using the Immersed Boundary Method with viscoelastic parameters determined a priori from measurements reported in the literature. Biofilm growth occurs at the biofilm-fluid interface by a stochastic rule that depends on the local nutrient concentration. We compare the growth, migration, and morphology of viscoelastic biofilms with a common relaxation time of 18 min over the range of elastic moduli 10–1000 Pa in different nearby nutrient source configurations. Simulations with shear flow and an upstream or a downstream nutrient source indicate that soft biofilms grow more if nutrients are downstream and stiff biofilms grow more if nutrients are upstream. Also, soft biofilms migrate faster than stiff biofilms toward a downstream nutrient source, and although stiff biofilms migrate toward an upstream nutrient source, soft biofilms do not. Simulations without nutrients show that on the time scale of several hours, soft biofilms develop irregular structures at the biofilm-fluid interface, but stiff biofilms deform little. Our results agree with the biophysical principle that biofilms can adapt to their mechanical and chemical environment by modulating their viscoelastic properties. We also compare the behavior of a purely elastic biofilm to a viscoelastic biofilm with the same elastic modulus of 50 Pa. We find that the elastic biofilm underestimates growth rates and downstream migration rates if the nutrient source is downstream, and it overestimates growth rates and upstream migration rates if the nutrient source is upstream. Future modeling can use our comparison to identify errors that can occur by simulating biofilms as purely elastic structures.

The efficacy of antiseptic agents against staphylococcal biofilm can be quantitatively assessed with the use of processed microscopic images

“…surface area that appears covered by a layer of cells when observed by a microscope), of average 93.6±5.5% (Table 1S). The generally accepted statement concerning cells in biofilms is that cells located in the top (T) layer of biofilm require more access to oxygen and to nutrients than the cells located in the bottom (B) parts of the biofilm [27]. Therefore, the latter cells are characterized by a lower metabolic activity and by an increased tolerance to these antimicrobials which act through interference with such energy-requiring processes as protein translation.…”

A Review on Contact and Collision Methods for Multi-Body Hydrodynamic Problems in Complex Flows

“…IBM was originally developed by Peskin [70] in the 1970s to simulate blood flow in cardiac mechanics. Since then, it has been broadly used to simulate hydrodynamic interactions between deformable or rigid solid structures and the surrounding fluid in diverse applications [71,72]. In the IBM, the equations of fluid dynamics -represented by the NSE -is discretized in the Eulerian frame, whereas the elastic immersed structure is defined in the Lagrangian frame using a set of IB nodes.…”

Residual cells and nutrient availability guide wound healing in bacterial biofilms

“…S6 (ESI †) where we altered Choosing parameter values. We assume the average doubling time of around 2 h 73,74 corresponding to the dimensionless growth rate: GR C 1.33 Â 10 À4 . Next, for simplicity we assume that the matrix secretion rate is the same as the growth rate GR = SR.…”