2019
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms7030073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biofilm Specific Activity: A Measure to Quantify Microbial Biofilm

Abstract: Microbes growing onto solid surfaces form complex 3-D biofilm structures characterized by the production of extracellular polymeric compounds and an increased resistance to drugs. The quantification of biofilm relays currently on a number of different approaches and techniques, often leading to different evaluations of the ability to form biofilms of the studied microbial strains. Measures of biofilm biomass were carried out with crystal violet (CV) and a direct reading at 405 nm, whereas the activity was asse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(59 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One‐day‐old biofilm mass was quantified with the crystal violet assay; metabolic activity was examined with the XTT assay as previously described by O'Toole (2011) and Hawser et al (1996), respectively. The crystal violet and XTT measures of biofilm formation do not necessarily correlate and can be considered two independent characteristics of a biofilm . Therefore, isolates were categorised either based on their level of biomass or based on metabolic activity distribution as low, intermediate or high biofilm producers according to a study published by Rajendran et al (2016) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One‐day‐old biofilm mass was quantified with the crystal violet assay; metabolic activity was examined with the XTT assay as previously described by O'Toole (2011) and Hawser et al (1996), respectively. The crystal violet and XTT measures of biofilm formation do not necessarily correlate and can be considered two independent characteristics of a biofilm . Therefore, isolates were categorised either based on their level of biomass or based on metabolic activity distribution as low, intermediate or high biofilm producers according to a study published by Rajendran et al (2016) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crystal violet and XTT measures of biofilm formation do not necessarily correlate and can be considered two independent characteristics of a biofilm. 13,17 Therefore, isolates were categorised either based on their level of biomass or based on metabolic activity distribution as low, intermediate or high biofilm producers according to a study published by Rajendran et al (2016). 10 Isolates within the first quartile (Q1) were classified as low biofilm producers, isolates with a biomass higher than the third quartile (Q3) were classified as high biofilm formers and those in between were classified as intermediate biofilm producers (Q2).…”
Section: Biofilm Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crystal violet (CV) and safranin (SAF) assays are commonly used for biomass quantification in biofilm-based research of Staphylococcus spp. [83][84][85]. Both methods are based on the use of specific dyes that penetrate through the biomass of pre-grown biofilms.…”
Section: Minimal Biofilm Eradication/eliminating Concentration Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-invasive measurements of activity in biofilms are not trivial, as many current methods rely on disrupting the biofilm and altering the chemical microenvironment, though some genetic (Poulsen et al, 1993;Kragh et al, 2014) and chemical reporters do exist (Corte et al, 2019). Most of these methods, however, only cover part of the metabolic output linked to, e.g., growth or production of molecules produced under certain conditions (Whooley and McLoughlin, 1982;Poulsen et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%