Biofilm-inactivating activity of silver nanoparticles: A comparison with silver ions

Park, Heejin; Park, Sumin; Roh, Jinkyu; Kim, Sujin; Choi, Kyunghee; Yi, Jongheop; Kim, Younghun; Yoon, Jeyong

doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2012.09.013

Cited by 76 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, the activity of micoorganisms in active sludge was influenced by AgNPs as well as its ions. In previous report [12], we found that AgNPs inactivated biofilms in a biosorption-dependent manner, although the activity of AgNPs against planktonic cells was ca. 10% that of silver ions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 75%

Biosorptive removal of bare-, citrate-, and PVP-coated silver nanoparticles from aqueous solution by activated sludge

Sung

Park

et al. 2015

Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 75%

Biosorptive removal of bare-, citrate-, and PVP-coated silver nanoparticles from aqueous solution by activated sludge

Sung

Park

et al. 2015

Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Park et al 239 analyzed the antimicrobial activity of AgNPs against PA01 planktonic bacteria and biofilm of P. aeruginosa, and the activity was compared with that of silver ions. The inactivation of biofilms by AgNPs was very sensitive to stirring, which caused a high AgNP bio-absorption.…”

Section: Silvermentioning

confidence: 99%

Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems for control of microbial biofilms: a review

Ramos¹,

Silva²,

Spósito³

et al. 2018

IJN

200

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since the dawn of civilization, it has been understood that pathogenic microorganisms cause infectious conditions in humans, which at times, may prove fatal. Among the different virulent properties of microorganisms is their ability to form biofilms, which has been directly related to the development of chronic infections with increased disease severity. A problem in the elimination of such complex structures (biofilms) is resistance to the drugs that are currently used in clinical practice, and therefore, it becomes imperative to search for new compounds that have anti-biofilm activity. In this context, nanotechnology provides secure platforms for targeted delivery of drugs to treat numerous microbial infections that are caused by biofilms. Among the many applications of such nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems is their ability to enhance the bioactive potential of therapeutic agents. The present study reports the use of important nanoparticles, such as liposomes, microemulsions, cyclodextrins, solid lipid nanoparticles, polymeric nanoparticles, and metallic nanoparticles, in controlling microbial biofilms by targeted drug delivery. Such utilization of these nanosystems has led to a better understanding of their applications and their role in combating biofilms.

show abstract

“…This process can be done in or out of the mouth. Sandblasting offers or produces a fresh, non-contaminating surface with a high surface energy and which can be easily wetted with suitable adhesive agents [9]. Tom Blake studied the effect of the delay in the application of the adhesive after etching the metal surface and saw that this was of great importance in wetting.…”

Section: Preparation Of the Metal Surfacementioning

confidence: 99%

“…One category are the monomers bearing the carboxyl group and its anhydride group [5] or the phosphonic acid group [8] for bonding to hard dental tissues, non-precious metal alloys and dental porcelains; Another category are the sulfur-containing monomers bearing the Dithiooctonoate group [8,9] for bonding to precious metals and their alloys. For strong and durable attachment to the aforementioned different substrate materials coexisting in the oral environment, it was anticipated that a combination of adhesive acid monomers and sulfur-containing monomers in multipurpose and adhesive primers would yield the desired result.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is the Ditio-Octonoate Monomer the Ideal for Adhesion to Precious Metals and their Alloys?

Estrada

2017

IJRRT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A descriptive bibliographic review of the evidence provided in indexed articles and other bibliographic sources, such as books, theses and others, has been made. These were analyzed and after checking whether or not they met the inclusion/exclusion criteria of this work, finally were 27 articles of bibliographic review published in a hairpin that goes from 2007 to 2016. IntroductionThe use of metals in dentistry has great therapeutic advantages in many fields of dentistry, such as orthodontics, prostheses, conservative dentistry since its origins and more recently implantology [2]. Likewise, metals can be used on numerous and varied substrates: enamel, dentin, ceramics, resins or other metals [1]. Examples of adhesion of enamel or dentin to metals, orthodontic bands and brackets, or Maryland type adhesive bridges. It may be necessary to attach a metal to ceramics in the case of a metal crown, which by aesthetics will be covered or another metal (such as a cast post) to the metal of the crown and / or ceramics thereof, or even when it is free of metal [4].The first and foremost objective of dental adhesives is the long-lasting attachment to their substrates or adhesives, whether hard dental tissues or a wide range of materials (some new and others already contaminated when already in the mouth). The adhesive system, already discovered by Bouncoure and Bowen in the 1960s, has meant an improvement in speed, efficiency and convenience by simplifying the joining steps of two bodies of disparate origin and nature and reducing the time in the clinician's working time. The current trend in the development of dental adhesive systems follows the line of self-etch adhesives, multipurpose primers or adhesives that give a strong and durable adhesion indiscriminately to a multitude of adherents that coexist in the oral environment, ranging from tejdios (Enamel and dentin), precious metals (noble), alloys of precious metals and alloys of non-precious metals to dental porcelain, ceramics based on aluminum oxide (alumina) and zirconium-based ceramics [6,7].Do not overlook the many detractors of self-etch adhesives. On the one hand self-etching adhesives are easy to use and less prone to cause postoperative sensitivity. Although on the other hand, AbstractThe use of metals in dentistry presupposes the need for mechanisms of retention or adhesion of the same to different substrates; Such as enamel, dentin, ceramics, old resins and other metals [1].Throughout history these mechanisms have been changing and evolving, from the purely mechanical retention to the present mechanisms of adhesion [2,3]. It is in the decade of the 70 when they begin to develop adhesion materials. Prior to this, retention was basically mechanical, having also evolved from macromechanical retention systems to micromechanical retention systems [3]. It is at the end of the 70 when the first generation of adhesives appears; These monomers were 4-META (4-methacryloyloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride) and 10-MDP (10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate). Thes...

show abstract

Biofilm-inactivating activity of silver nanoparticles: A comparison with silver ions

Cited by 76 publications

References 32 publications

Biosorptive removal of bare-, citrate-, and PVP-coated silver nanoparticles from aqueous solution by activated sludge

Biosorptive removal of bare-, citrate-, and PVP-coated silver nanoparticles from aqueous solution by activated sludge

Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems for control of microbial biofilms: a review

Is the Ditio-Octonoate Monomer the Ideal for Adhesion to Precious Metals and their Alloys?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About