2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0758-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biofidelic whole cervical spine model with muscle force replication for whiplash simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Being an in vitro study, the effects of the neuromuscular control system were not included. The muscle force simulation, adopted from a previous study [13], provided biofidelic compressive loads (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being an in vitro study, the effects of the neuromuscular control system were not included. The muscle force simulation, adopted from a previous study [13], provided biofidelic compressive loads (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surrogate head and spine were stabilized using the compressive muscle force replication (MFR) system (Fig. 2) [15]. The MFR system consisted of four anterior, two posterior and eight lateral cables attached to preloaded springs anchored to the base.…”
Section: Specimen Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rear-impact whiplash simulation was performed using a previously developed bench-top sled apparatus [15,31]. An incremental trauma protocol was used to rear-impact the WCS+MFR model at 3.5, 5, 6.5 and 8 g, following the initial 2 g dynamic pre-conditioning that was necessary due to the viscoelastic behavior of the soft tissues [26].…”
Section: Trauma Production and Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dummy included an independent muscle model that considers active and passive mechanical characteristics together. This applied muscle model designed to include the driver's instinctual physiological reaction was installed outside the cervical structure of the existing dummy, leaving the existing structure intact, compared to the model used by Hedenstierna, et al and the whole cervical model designed by Ivancic other models [7,8]. This modified model also has certain limitations.…”
Section: Modified Dummy With Applied Muscle Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model's muscle force replication can produce dynamic responses that are nearly identical to those in the human body. Ivancic, et al evaluated the performance of restraint systems during whiplash by combining their whole cervical spine model with a BioRID (Biomechanical Rear Impact Dummy) II dummy [8]. However, this model did not consider the active characteristics of muscles, and it was unable to measure changes in muscle length and muscle force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%