2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biofeedback versus bilateral transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of functional non-retentive fecal incontinence in children: A randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Children who received biofeedback had the highest significant decrease in FI. score when compared with the other groups [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Children who received biofeedback had the highest significant decrease in FI. score when compared with the other groups [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Comparing conventional treatment alone with conventional treatment plus biofeedback therapy in children with functional FI, biofeedback therapy does not provide an additional advantage of relieving symptoms of both constipation and FI (41). Like constipation-associated FI, biofeedback therapy for FNRFI did not show therapeutic benefits in old studies (18,39); however, a recent study comparing dietary advices and pelvic floor strengthening using Kegal exercises, biofeedback in addition to the dietary advices and Kegal exercises, and transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation, showed that biofeedback therapy was significantly more successful in decreasing the number of FI episodes and improving the FI score, compared to other two groups (44)…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The international continence society classifies anal incontinence as any involuntary passage of stool and/or gas and divides it into two types, Fecal incontinence (FI) and gas incontinence at least once/month for two successive months. 1,2 FI frequency ranges between .8% and 7.8% while Musa et al reported that the incidence may be up to 21%. 3 FI has a major negative impact on the quality of life (QoL) and occasionally results in depression and social exclusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Fecal incontinence can result from dysfunction of any of these structures so it is a more complicated and multifaceted illness. 2 Functional FI is classified into retentive (associated with stool retention and "overflow") and non-retentive FI (FNRFI) based on Rome IV criteria and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms are still unclear. 7 the Rome III classification defines FNRFI as FI in a kid with a mental age > 4 years and without evidence of a metabolic, anatomical, or inflammatory etiology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation