2018
DOI: 10.26417/ejnm.v1i1.p53-58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biofeedback Training for the Recovery of Urinary Continence After Prostatectomy: a Systematic Review

Abstract: 0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moore et al (2008) compared the impact of biofeedback‐enhanced PFMT with verbal and written PFMT, and the results indicated that the two methods seemed to be equal effective in term of the rate of continence. The results were similar in the study by Santos et al (2017). Two studies (Zhang et al, 2006, 2017) explored the impact of social support and follow‐up care combined with biofeedback‐enhanced PFMT in post‐prostatectomy patients and prostate cancer survivors, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moore et al (2008) compared the impact of biofeedback‐enhanced PFMT with verbal and written PFMT, and the results indicated that the two methods seemed to be equal effective in term of the rate of continence. The results were similar in the study by Santos et al (2017). Two studies (Zhang et al, 2006, 2017) explored the impact of social support and follow‐up care combined with biofeedback‐enhanced PFMT in post‐prostatectomy patients and prostate cancer survivors, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Interestingly, as for the effect of initiating the biofeedback‐enhanced PFMT after surgery compared with the control group received placebo therapy or no formal education or without treatment, six studies (Marchiori et al, 2010; Oh et al, 2020; Rajkowska‐Labon et al, 2014; Ribeiro et al, 2010; Van Kampen et al, 2000; Zhang et al, 2017) reported the positive results only one study (Mathewson‐Chapman, 1997) reported the negative results. However, the interventions seemed to be unsuccessful compared with verbal instructions on the PFMT with three (Floratos et al, 2002; Moore et al, 2008; Santos et al, 2017) reported the negative results and only one (Szczygielska et al, 2022) reported the positive results. Effect of preoperative biofeedback‐enhanced PFMT in men with UI had also led to conflicting conclusions due to 10 studies (Allameh et al, 2021; Aydin Sayilan & Ozbas, 2018; Burgio et al, 2006; Doorbar‐Baptist et al, 2017; Milios et al, 2019; Patel et al, 2013; Perez et al, 2018; Sathianathen et al, 2017; Tienforti et al, 2012; Yoshida et al, 2019) reported the positive results and six studies (Bales et al, 2000; Crowe, 2018; de Lira et al, 2019; Dijkstra‐Eshuis et al, 2015; Geraerts et al, 2013; Parekh et al, 2003) reported the negative results in this review.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most authors recommended that supervised training should be performed independently at home daily [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 23 , 26 , 29 , 32 , 37 , 42 , 46 ] and that supervised training is much more effective and long-lasting than unsupervised PFMT. In most studies, home PFMT consisted of three sets of 10 [ 37 ], 15 [ 43 ], or 20 PFM contractions in a single session [ 19 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BF can also be combined with PFMT [ 16 , 19 , 21 , 35 , 41 , 46 ]. Studies have indicated that BF-assisted training can improve short-term and long-term continence more effectively than PFMT alone [ 67 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation