2011
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-7094(11)70013-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioethics and Anesthesia: A Reflexive Study of Reports Published in the Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Not unlike other fields, these have been used to assess the accumu lated knowledge about a specific topic, for example, stem cell research (Zarzeczny & Caulfield, 2009), biobanks (Wendler, 2006), or endoflife care (Rietjens et al, 2012). From time to time, the scholars conducting these reviews have used bibliometric methods to describe the content and scope of the literature on a topic, or the nature of the ethics literature within a journal or country (Baldwin et al, 2003;Belinchon, Ramos, & Bellver, 2007;Borry, Schotsmans, & Dierickx, 2005, 2006a, 2006bCohen et al, 2008;Dos Santos & de France, 2011;Hossne, 2011;Jiang et al, 2012;Marques, de Sousa, & Gimenez Galvao, 2006;Pizzani, da Silva, & Hossne, 2010;Stepke, 2010). Scholars have also used bibliometric methods to measure compliance with research ethics regulations and to trace the life cycle of scientific misconduct (Dagg & Seidle, 2004;Garfield & Welljams Dorof, 1990;Korpela, 2010;Neale, Dailey, & Abrams, 2010;Neale et al, 2007;Steen, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not unlike other fields, these have been used to assess the accumu lated knowledge about a specific topic, for example, stem cell research (Zarzeczny & Caulfield, 2009), biobanks (Wendler, 2006), or endoflife care (Rietjens et al, 2012). From time to time, the scholars conducting these reviews have used bibliometric methods to describe the content and scope of the literature on a topic, or the nature of the ethics literature within a journal or country (Baldwin et al, 2003;Belinchon, Ramos, & Bellver, 2007;Borry, Schotsmans, & Dierickx, 2005, 2006a, 2006bCohen et al, 2008;Dos Santos & de France, 2011;Hossne, 2011;Jiang et al, 2012;Marques, de Sousa, & Gimenez Galvao, 2006;Pizzani, da Silva, & Hossne, 2010;Stepke, 2010). Scholars have also used bibliometric methods to measure compliance with research ethics regulations and to trace the life cycle of scientific misconduct (Dagg & Seidle, 2004;Garfield & Welljams Dorof, 1990;Korpela, 2010;Neale, Dailey, & Abrams, 2010;Neale et al, 2007;Steen, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%