2021
DOI: 10.5414/cp203936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioequivalence study of two favipiravir tablet formulations in healthy male subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite this second run of experiments, the CC 10 could not be obtained for remdesivir, dexamethasone, and favipiravir, as the cytotoxic effect of these compounds was not extensive enough in a relevant concentration range to obtain a sigmoidal curve. In these cases, the maximum plasma concentration (C max ) or 10-fold of the C max was used to ensure a physiologically relevant concentration range [ 27 , 28 , 29 ]. Thereafter, the CC 10 , C max , or C max x10 of each drug ( Table 1 ) was used as a benchmark concentration (BC) to set a working concentration range to be tested—namely, BC-BC/2-BC/10 for protein and mRNA quantification measurements, and BCx10-BCx5-BCx2-BC-BC/2-BC/10 for the assessment of effects on Panx1 channel activity ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this second run of experiments, the CC 10 could not be obtained for remdesivir, dexamethasone, and favipiravir, as the cytotoxic effect of these compounds was not extensive enough in a relevant concentration range to obtain a sigmoidal curve. In these cases, the maximum plasma concentration (C max ) or 10-fold of the C max was used to ensure a physiologically relevant concentration range [ 27 , 28 , 29 ]. Thereafter, the CC 10 , C max , or C max x10 of each drug ( Table 1 ) was used as a benchmark concentration (BC) to set a working concentration range to be tested—namely, BC-BC/2-BC/10 for protein and mRNA quantification measurements, and BCx10-BCx5-BCx2-BC-BC/2-BC/10 for the assessment of effects on Panx1 channel activity ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pharmacokinetic parameters in the present study were slightly higher than those reported in previous studies, which reported mean C max and AUC 0-∞ values in the range of ≈5-6 μg/mL and 10-13 h • μg/mL, respectively, after oral administration of equivalent favipiravir 200-mg doses in healthy subjects under fasting conditions. [21][22][23] The current study had limitations that should be considered. Since data were obtained only from healthy subjects with a limited number of sample sizes, the pharmacokinetic characteristics of favipiravir might not represent the whole population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In another study to evaluate the bioequivalence of two favipiravir oral tablet formulations (200 mg) in Caucasian adult males under fasting conditions, the observed Cp max of the reference product was 5002.171 ± 1231.177 ng/mL and AUC 0-∞ was 10152.115 ± 2507.694 ng.h/mL. T max was 0.75 h while t 1/2 was 1.319 h [34]. The results showed substantial comparisons between Caucasian and Egyptian volunteers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%