Abstract:Changes in trophic niche—the pathways through which an organism obtains energy and nutrients—are a fundamental way in which organisms respond to environmental conditions. But the capacity for species to alter their trophic niches in response to global change, and the ways they do so when able, remain largely unknown.
Here we examine food webs in three long‐term and large‐scale experiments to test how resource availability and nutritional requirements interact to determine an organism's trophic niche in the con… Show more
“…We speculate that as Amdro® reduced colony sizes, dietary specialisation started to occur at the colony level because smaller colonies would likely sample and isotopically reflect a reduced portion of the patchy landscape. Intraspecific dietary specialisation and its reflection in isotopic signatures have been documented in several species (Martínez del Rio et al ., 2009; Newsome et al ., 2009; Helms IV et al ., 2021) and fire ants have large diet flexibility at both small and large spatial scales (Wilder et al ., 2011; Resasco et al ., 2012; Roeder & Kaspari, 2017). Alternatively, the observed shift in fire ant diet breadth may suggest changes in the invertebrate food web beyond our simple observations on the abundance and species richness of ants.…”
1. Invasive species and habitat disturbance are among the most important drivers of biodiversity loss and ecological change. Their individual effects, however, are difficult to disentangle because invasion and disturbance are often intimately linked.Here we test alternative hypotheses to determine if the invasive red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta, is a 'driver' or simply a 'passenger' of ecological change in a longleaf pine ecosystem.2. We randomly assigned treatments of (1) unmanipulated, (2) soil disturbance, (3) fire ant removal and (4) soil disturbance + fire ant removal to experimental blocks and measured how ant communities changed over 2 years in thirty-six 15-m 2 plots.3. Fire ant abundance in removal plots averaged 42% lower in pitfall traps and 95% lower on baits compared to unmanipulated, control plots. Species richness of co-occurring ants also decreased 42% in removal plots, with significant changes in community composition. Soil disturbance alone did not affect ant communities. Fire ant diet breadth-measured using carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes-increased up to 4.7-fold in soil disturbance + removal plots (i.e. 0.84‰ 2 to 3.94‰ 2 ).4. While non-target impacts of the fire ant removal treatment complicate interpretation, our results suggest fire ants follow an alternative 'interacting drivers' model in which partial recovery of some species occurs when populations of an invasive species are reduced. Further recovery of native ants may be limited by persisting, landscape-level effects of fire ants suppressing co-occurring ants below historical levels.
“…We speculate that as Amdro® reduced colony sizes, dietary specialisation started to occur at the colony level because smaller colonies would likely sample and isotopically reflect a reduced portion of the patchy landscape. Intraspecific dietary specialisation and its reflection in isotopic signatures have been documented in several species (Martínez del Rio et al ., 2009; Newsome et al ., 2009; Helms IV et al ., 2021) and fire ants have large diet flexibility at both small and large spatial scales (Wilder et al ., 2011; Resasco et al ., 2012; Roeder & Kaspari, 2017). Alternatively, the observed shift in fire ant diet breadth may suggest changes in the invertebrate food web beyond our simple observations on the abundance and species richness of ants.…”
1. Invasive species and habitat disturbance are among the most important drivers of biodiversity loss and ecological change. Their individual effects, however, are difficult to disentangle because invasion and disturbance are often intimately linked.Here we test alternative hypotheses to determine if the invasive red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta, is a 'driver' or simply a 'passenger' of ecological change in a longleaf pine ecosystem.2. We randomly assigned treatments of (1) unmanipulated, (2) soil disturbance, (3) fire ant removal and (4) soil disturbance + fire ant removal to experimental blocks and measured how ant communities changed over 2 years in thirty-six 15-m 2 plots.3. Fire ant abundance in removal plots averaged 42% lower in pitfall traps and 95% lower on baits compared to unmanipulated, control plots. Species richness of co-occurring ants also decreased 42% in removal plots, with significant changes in community composition. Soil disturbance alone did not affect ant communities. Fire ant diet breadth-measured using carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes-increased up to 4.7-fold in soil disturbance + removal plots (i.e. 0.84‰ 2 to 3.94‰ 2 ).4. While non-target impacts of the fire ant removal treatment complicate interpretation, our results suggest fire ants follow an alternative 'interacting drivers' model in which partial recovery of some species occurs when populations of an invasive species are reduced. Further recovery of native ants may be limited by persisting, landscape-level effects of fire ants suppressing co-occurring ants below historical levels.
“…For example, ant response to fuel reduction methods in forests can inform forest-management activities in the Appalachian Mountains, USA (Campbell et al, 2019), and ant response to grazing has guided rangeland management in Australia (Anderson & Majer, 2004;Read & Anderson, 2000). Ants have been used, albeit sparingly, as bioindicators in studies of anthropogenic disturbance from renewable energy development, such as forest bioenergy (Grodsky et al, 2018) and biofuel cropping systems (Helms et al, 2020(Helms et al, , 2021Kim et al, 2017).…”
Land‐use change from solar energy development may affect desert ecosystems and the soils, plants, and animals therein, yet our understanding of these interactions is nascent. With their ubiquity, criticality as ecosystem constituents, and sensitivity to environmental variation, ants may be useful study organisms for elucidating ecological effects of solar energy development in deserts. Our objectives were to disentangle the response of a desert ant community to solar energy development decisions and test the efficacy of ants as bioindicators at a solar power facility (392 MW) in the Mojave Desert, USA. We used pitfall traps to collect ants in treatments representing different solar energy development decisions, including variably intense site preparation practices: blading (i.e., bulldozing) and mowing, and establishment of undeveloped patches in solar fields, replicated across three power blocks comprising the facility and in undeveloped control sites surrounding the facility. We determined that ant abundance, species richness, Shannon Diversity Index, and functional richness were lower in bladed treatments than in all other treatments and controls. For most taxonomic and functional ant responses, we detected no difference between nonbladed treatments and controls; these results suggest that less intensive site preparation and increased spatial heterogeneity (i.e., undeveloped patches in solar fields) can reduce the negative effects of solar energy development on desert ants. However, our results indicate that ants may serve as useful bioindicators of the severity of anthropogenic disturbance from solar energy development in deserts, and indicator analysis signifies that solar energy infrastructure may negatively affect some species with high ecological value (e.g., harvester ants). Negative effects of solar energy development on ants can have significant implications for desert ecosystem function and integrity, but conservation‐minded solar facility design and construction may lead to avoidance of “bottom‐up” ecological ramifications of increased solar production during the renewable energy transition.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.