We thank the authors of the Letter to the Editor for their excellent comments about bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) technique.We would like to emphasize aspects that complicate the nutrition assessment of critically ill patients, mainly children and adolescents. The difficulties are noted both in anthropometry and in body composition assessment. However, despite these difficulties, nutrition assessment is important and useful for classifying nutrition status, as well as for planning nutrition therapy and nutrition monitoring 1 ; the combination of several assessment methods is essential for an accurate nutrition diagnosis and prognostic improvement.BIA is a method for assessing the body composition of outpatients and inpatients in various clinical situations, which is by way of an electric current of low intensity (800 μA) and fixed frequency (50 kHz) through the body, measuring primary components-resistance, reactance, and phase angle (PA)-and estimating by mathematical equations: fat-free mass (FFM) and total body water. 2,3 It is known that a multitude of factors may influence the reliability of BIA measurement such as fasting, electrode placement, physical activity, and hydration. 4 The estimates made by BIA are based on 2 assumptions: that tissue hydration is the same in all individuals and that the body behaves like a cylinder that conducts the electric current uniformly. Thus, BIA does not seem to be a good method to evaluate body composition in cases where these 2 principles are not valid, such as critically ill patients who usually present with hydration disorders, since the amount of total body water interferes in FFM and fat mass estimation. Taking this into account, the aim of our study 5 was not to use the body composition estimation by BIA but rather the PA whose measurement indirectly reflects the FFM, and it is not subjected to prediction equations and it is not influenced by hydration. Thus, to avoid the hydration bias in FFM, we did not use the body compartments estimation by BIA, and we just considered the PA values. In addition, we followed Thibault et al 6 and Stapel et al 7 technique to the letter who also studied the PA behavior by BIA in critically ill adults. We believe that the cutoff value obtained may contribute to the care of children and adolescents in similar pediatric intensive care units (ICUs) around the world in both developed and developing countries, and it may also encourage further and necessary studies.To conclude, we believe that for the accuracy of measurements it is always better to have ideal conditions (which most of the time are not plausible in the ICU). Despite said difficulties, this should not be a reason to not perform nutrition assessment in these units.