Biodiversity Research Trends and Gaps from the Confluence of Three Global Biodiversity Hotspots in the Far-Eastern Himalaya

Abstract

The Far-Eastern Himalaya Landscape (FHL), a shared transboundary landscape between China, India, and Myanmar, is one of the most intact and biologically rich landscapes in the Eastern Himalaya. Yet, the state of biodiversity and its significance are comparatively poorly known to conservationists and policy makers due to low priority in research, inaccessibility, and remoteness. We collated and reviewed 1032 articles relating to biodiversity of the FHL to understand research trends, identify knowledge gaps, and suggest priority research areas for future biodiversity conservation and management in the landscape. Our review showed that the Myanmar part of the landscape is the most studied, followed by the Indian and Chinese parts. The trend of publications in the landscape showed that the earliest publication on biodiversity in the FHL dates back to 1833, while the years from 2001 to 2017 account for almost 80% of the total publications. Most studies focused on species (73.6%), followed by ecosystems (25%) and genetics (1.4%). Mammals were the most studied taxa (22.6%), with a greater focus on charismatic megafauna, followed by arthropods (15.6%), angiosperms (14.8%), insects (13.4%), and birds (10.8%). There were very few publications on lower invertebrates and lower kingdoms, Monera, Protista, Fungi, and Viruses. At the ecosystem level, most studies focused on forests (58.5%) followed by freshwater (32%), agroecosystems (9%), and alpine/tundra ecosystem (0.5%); there were only 14 studies at genetic level. In the FHL, new species have been discovered and rediscovered starting from the early 1930s until 2017. The majority of newly discovered species in the last 18 years are arthropods. The paper reviews past research areas, identifies gaps for future research and intervention, and recommends transboundary collaboration to address these gaps for conservation and sustainable development of the FHL landscape.

Avitourism opportunities as a contribution to conservation and rural livelihoods in the Hindu Kush Himalaya - a field perspective

“…One of the key highlights of this work was that it was undertaken outside of the two critical protected areas of the region: Corbett and Rajaji tiger reserves (Figure 1). Avitourism performed outside of protected areas has the potential to assist in protecting bird habitats that are not subject to such a high level of statutory protection, and spreading societal benefits and tourism pressures including reducing disturbance to threatened species within the protected areas (Basnet et al 2019). Such supportive benefits have also been previously reported from southern Poland, where riverine habitats constitute biodiversity hotspots for migratory birds (Figarski & Kajtoch 2015).…”

Sustainable consumption and production of wildlife tourism in Indian tiger reserves: a critical analysis

“…The park has a rich biodiversity with a variety of birds, butterflies, mammals and several species of reptiles. Bird-watching tourism outside of protected areas or in buffer area provides societal benefits and reduces tourism pressures and disturbance to threatened species within the protected areas (Basnet et al , 2019).…”

A Review of Two Decades of Conservation Efforts on Tigers, Co-Predators and Prey at the Junction of Three Global Biodiversity Hotspots in the Transboundary Far-Eastern Himalayan Landscape

“…FeHL (24°37′40.09″–28°32′35.3″ N and 95°27′13.75″–99°8′15.57″ E) covers an area of more than 71,400 km 2 and ranges in elevation from 200 to 5800 m a.s.l. [ 24 ]. It is a transboundary landscape that stretches from the Nujiang River and Gaoligongshan Nature Reserve of China to Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Kamlang Tiger Reserve, and Dibang Valley Wildlife Sanctuary of India in the east, and the Hkakaborazi National Park, the Hponkanrazi Wildlife Sanctuary, and Hukaung Valley Wildlife Sanctuary of Myanmar in the center ( Figure 1 ).…”