2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biodegradation of phenol and phenol-related compounds by psychrophilic and cold-tolerant alpine yeasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
2
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
73
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…and one yeast (Cryptococcus) were identified as the main degraders. Other Cryptococcus isolates degraded phenol in laboratory media (Middelhoven, 1993;Bergauer et al, 2005) and, in one DNA-SIP study, a member of the same order (Tramellales) was detected as a phenol degrader in soil (DeRito and Madsen, 2009). Equally, Arthrobacter and Rhodococcus isolates can degrade phenol Karigar et al, 2006;Martinkova et al, 2009), and members of both genera were detected by DNA-SIP as phenanthrene degraders in soil (Cebron et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and one yeast (Cryptococcus) were identified as the main degraders. Other Cryptococcus isolates degraded phenol in laboratory media (Middelhoven, 1993;Bergauer et al, 2005) and, in one DNA-SIP study, a member of the same order (Tramellales) was detected as a phenol degrader in soil (DeRito and Madsen, 2009). Equally, Arthrobacter and Rhodococcus isolates can degrade phenol Karigar et al, 2006;Martinkova et al, 2009), and members of both genera were detected by DNA-SIP as phenanthrene degraders in soil (Cebron et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These compounds are harmful to human health, and suspected to be carcinogens. Many techniques including physical adsorption [3][4][5][6][7][8], electrochemical oxidation [9][10][11], biodegradation [12][13][14], catalytic wet oxidation [15][16][17], and Fenton reagent oxidation [18][19][20] have been adopted for the removal of phenolic and aniline pollutants. Though practicable and effective these methods are, they also have some drawbacks, such as high cost, incomplete removal, more toxic byproducts than original pollutants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Semple and Cain, 1996), and Rhodococcus sp. (Bergauer et al, 2005). These aerobes are more efficient at degrading toxic compounds because they grow faster than anaerobes and usually transform organic compounds to inorganic compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%