2016
DOI: 10.1080/03601234.2016.1211906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biodegradation of malathion, α- and β-endosulfan by bacterial strains isolated from agricultural soil in Veracruz, Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Odukkathil and Vasudevan [119] recorded that Bordetella petrii I had degraded 89% of α-endosulfan and 84% of β-endosulfan whilst Bordetella petrii II was capable in degrading 82% of both endosulfan isomers. Jimenez-Torres et al [120] reported that Enterobacter cloacae strain PMM16 had degraded 100% of β-endosulfan and 71.32% of α-endosulfan within twentyfour days through non-oxidative pathways on basis of the absence degradation metabolites such as endosulfan lactone, endosulfan sulfate or endosulfan diol. [26] Biodenitrification with sand filtering was found to be an efficient method with over 70 % removal efficiency of the endosulfan [132].…”
Section: Bacterial Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Odukkathil and Vasudevan [119] recorded that Bordetella petrii I had degraded 89% of α-endosulfan and 84% of β-endosulfan whilst Bordetella petrii II was capable in degrading 82% of both endosulfan isomers. Jimenez-Torres et al [120] reported that Enterobacter cloacae strain PMM16 had degraded 100% of β-endosulfan and 71.32% of α-endosulfan within twentyfour days through non-oxidative pathways on basis of the absence degradation metabolites such as endosulfan lactone, endosulfan sulfate or endosulfan diol. [26] Biodenitrification with sand filtering was found to be an efficient method with over 70 % removal efficiency of the endosulfan [132].…”
Section: Bacterial Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acinetobacter johnsonii can degrade malathion co-metabolically, as it cannot devour malathion as a sole carbon source [22]. Similarly, bacterial species, such as Bacillus licheniformis [23], Pseudomonas putida, Rhodoccocus rhodochrous, Sphingomonas species [10], Enterobacter amnigenus [24], and Bacillus species [25], isolated from diverse samples, were found to be exceptionally proficient in malathion degradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%