Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biodegradability of natural dissolved organic matter collected from a UK moorland stream

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Novel molecules are synthesized by soil microbes, and some of these metabolites enter the DOM reservoir in groundwater of systems (Chapelle et al 2009(Chapelle et al , 2011. In comparison, substantially higher percentages of BDOC were measured in surface water (29 ± 1 %; this study), which is consistent when compared to average literature values for streams (11-27 %), lakes (14 %), rivers (19 %), and seawater (19 %) (Qualls and Haines 1992;Søndergaard and Middelboe 1995;Volk et al 1997;Stutter et al 2013). The percentages of BDOC reported in coastal estuaries were quite variable (8-29 %) but mostly higher than those in groundwater (Moran and Hodson 1999;Raymond and Bauer 2000;Lønborg and Søndergaard 2009).…”
Section: Dom Bioavailability In Groundwatersupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Novel molecules are synthesized by soil microbes, and some of these metabolites enter the DOM reservoir in groundwater of systems (Chapelle et al 2009(Chapelle et al , 2011. In comparison, substantially higher percentages of BDOC were measured in surface water (29 ± 1 %; this study), which is consistent when compared to average literature values for streams (11-27 %), lakes (14 %), rivers (19 %), and seawater (19 %) (Qualls and Haines 1992;Søndergaard and Middelboe 1995;Volk et al 1997;Stutter et al 2013). The percentages of BDOC reported in coastal estuaries were quite variable (8-29 %) but mostly higher than those in groundwater (Moran and Hodson 1999;Raymond and Bauer 2000;Lønborg and Søndergaard 2009).…”
Section: Dom Bioavailability In Groundwatersupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Despite this, we did not find evidence for widespread consistent and rapid in-stream and estuarine processing of fluvial C. C losses were confined to a few biogeochemical 'hot spots' in the lower reaches of the catchment and sporadic elsewhere, yet where they occurred the losses were on occasion very high, up to 44 % for DOC loss downstream of confluences and approximately 30 % DOC loss during estuarinefreshwater mixing. These results provide evidence that peat-derived fluvial C may be highly reactive, and that rapid physico-chemical processes may at times cause losses that are significantly larger than reported at longer timescales for microbial consumption (Dawson et al 2012;Hulatt et al 2014;Stutter et al 2013) or photochemical degradation (Mann et al 2012;Worrall and Moody 2014). The strong negative correlation between reach-scale declines in DOC/POC and Mg and Si suggest that on most occasions apparent fluvial C losses are due to mixing with unmeasured sub-surface inputs of mineral-rich and POCor DOC-poor waters, rather than in-stream processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…For catchments with varying proportions of peat cover in northern Finland, potential DOC biodegradation rates in laboratory incubations (nutrients were added to prevent nutrient limitation) ranged from 4.1 to 17.9 % (Hulatt et al 2014) and averaged 8.89 % (Asmala et al 2014a) during incubations lasting 55 and 39 days, respectively. In a batch experiment Stutter et al (2013) found that similar to other northern rivers, a maximum 19 % of DOM isolated from a Scottish moorland stream was biodegradable during 41-days incubation, and that the proportion of DOM decomposed could be predicted by DOM quality and 15 N content. Overall, these studies suggest that given time (on the order of days) and sufficient nutrients, biodegradation potentially removes up to 20 % of DOC from the water column in northern rivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This behavior can be verified by comparing treatments: T1 (irrigated without nitrogen), with T6 (not irrigated with 140kg ha -1 of N) that did not differ statistically, probably due to the increased rate of mineralization of soil organic matter in T1, which supplied the demand of N of the plant, resulting in an increase in productivity. Soil moisture has important effects on the mineralization of organic N, since it directly determines the availability of water for the activity and survival of microorganisms, thereby increasing the levels of mineralized nitrogen (COOK &ORCHARD, 2008 andSTUTTER et al, 2013). …”
Section: ---------------------------------(%)------------------------mentioning
confidence: 99%