2018
DOI: 10.1177/0031512517744471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biocultural Predictors of Motor Coordination Among Prepubertal Boys and Girls

Abstract: This study aimed to predict motor coordination from a matrix of biocultural factors for 173 children (89 boys, 84 girls) aged 7-9 years who were assessed with the Körperkoordinationtest für Kinder test battery. Socioeconomic variables included built environment, area of residence, mother's educational level, and mother's physical activity level (using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire [short version]). The behavioral domain was marked by participation in organized sports and habitual physical a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results showed that in girls the % body fat and waist circumference were associated with low motor coordination, but among boys all adiposity indicators, including WHtR, were associated with low motor coordination. Other studies involving motor coordination in children between 7 and 9 years old used the WHtR within a multivariate set of indicators related to morphology (Luz, Valente‐dos‐Santos, et al, ) and biological traits (Luz, Coelho‐e‐Silva, et al, ), but without assessing WHtR's specific contribution to children's motor coordination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results showed that in girls the % body fat and waist circumference were associated with low motor coordination, but among boys all adiposity indicators, including WHtR, were associated with low motor coordination. Other studies involving motor coordination in children between 7 and 9 years old used the WHtR within a multivariate set of indicators related to morphology (Luz, Valente‐dos‐Santos, et al, ) and biological traits (Luz, Coelho‐e‐Silva, et al, ), but without assessing WHtR's specific contribution to children's motor coordination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ages of the included children ranged from 3 to 12 years, but the majority of the studies were performed on 3–6-year-old children. Only five (16.1%) out of the 31 studies investigated children older than 6 years [ 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ]. The included articles measured the performances of different motor skills (see Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other parental behaviors that were investigated were parental PA behaviors [ 31 , 38 , 41 , 44 ] and rearing behaviors [ 44 , 49 , 57 , 59 ]. Three studies investigated the relationship between the amount of PA performed by parents and motor performance in 3–6-year-old children.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11] Because motor competence during childhood is associated with physical activity and fitness, 5,7,12,13 evaluating the impact of excessive weight on motor competence development is pivotal. So far, most cross-sectional [9][10][11][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and longitudinal 12,13,[21][22][23] studies reported a negative relationship between weight status or adiposity and motor competence in children. Moreover, longitudinal studies indicate that motor competence and weight status or adiposity might present mutual relationship in children older than 6 years of age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%