2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11625-022-01155-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biocultural conservation systems in the Mediterranean region: the role of values, rules, and knowledge

Abstract: The Mediterranean Basin is a global biodiversity hotspot, but formal conservation approaches have not been wholly effective to halt species and ecosystem losses in this world region. There is wide agreement that maintaining traditional and diverse land-use systems is key to conserving biodiversity across the Mediterranean region. Biocultural approaches provide a perspective to understand and manage the interplay of nature and culture in various contexts. To develop biocultural systems as positive alternatives … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other more ordinary landscapes of trees outside of forests, landscapes which are less esthetically interesting or whose production is more marginal, are also threatened or have already disappeared [4,[12][13][14]17]. These landscapes represent, nonetheless, an intergenerational legacy where much is at stake, both ecologically and economically [55], but most especially, on a sociocultural and symbolic level [9,56]. On the other hand, the traditional agroforestry systems have received increasing attention in recent decades for their multifunctional role and as a sustainable development model in a world facing global changes [57].…”
Section: Working Landscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other more ordinary landscapes of trees outside of forests, landscapes which are less esthetically interesting or whose production is more marginal, are also threatened or have already disappeared [4,[12][13][14]17]. These landscapes represent, nonetheless, an intergenerational legacy where much is at stake, both ecologically and economically [55], but most especially, on a sociocultural and symbolic level [9,56]. On the other hand, the traditional agroforestry systems have received increasing attention in recent decades for their multifunctional role and as a sustainable development model in a world facing global changes [57].…”
Section: Working Landscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consideration of this knowledge in all decision-making structures and processes of the mount management strategy and implementation is necessary. Research and case studies from the Mediterranean and around the world illustrate that a biocultural approach that is inclusive of ecological local knowledge is a vital instrument to design culturally appropriate conservation contexts (Plieninger et al, 2023;Topp et al, 2021;Aziz et al, 2022;Nemogá et al, 2022). For example, while technical and scienti c knowledge are both necessary to develop grazing management and pasture improvement plans, local knowledge can serve in the identi cation of important forage plants and their impact on production and health of livestock.…”
Section: Vrk Perception and Interplaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ample evidence in literature illustrates the signi cant contributions of indigenous people and local communities to ecosystem management and creation of knowledge based on the diverse values of nature, which is key to inform decision-making (Brondízio et al 2021;Azzopardi et al, 2022). Despite this importance, values, rules and knowledge and the resulting practices of communities are, to date, most often poorly integrated in most conservation contexts nor fully recognized by society at large (Mishra et al, 2017;Montgomery et al, 2020;Brondízio et al, 2021) and which is particularly the case in Lebanon (Plieninger et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These institutions, consisting of both formal and informal rules, represent cultural frameworks for interpreting landscapes (Quinn et al, 2007). The institutions involved in governing landscape commons emphasize the preservation and transformation of the multi-function and biophysical characteristics of landscapes, and are closely related to the customs, equity, and values of the local people (Gerber & Hess, 2017;Plieninger et al, 2023;Vialatte et al, 2019). However, amidst the process of landscape change, institutions are also influenced by external socioeconomic shifts, and conflicts can arise among stakeholders involved in managing landscape commons, in which specific values and functions are stressed while others are ignored, consequently exerting pressure on landscapes (Bürgi et al, 2017;Evans et al, 2008;Ford et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%