BioCreative III interactive task: an overview

Abstract

BackgroundThe BioCreative challenge evaluation is a community-wide effort for evaluating text mining and information extraction systems applied to the biological domain. The biocurator community, as an active user of biomedical literature, provides a diverse and engaged end user group for text mining tools. Earlier BioCreative challenges involved many text mining teams in developing basic capabilities relevant to biological curation, but they did not address the issues of system usage, insertion into the workflow and adoption by curators. Thus in BioCreative III (BC-III), the InterActive Task (IAT) was introduced to address the utility and usability of text mining tools for real-life biocuration tasks. To support the aims of the IAT in BC-III, involvement of both developers and end users was solicited, and the development of a user interface to address the tasks interactively was requested.ResultsA User Advisory Group (UAG) actively participated in the IAT design and assessment. The task focused on gene normalization (identifying gene mentions in the article and linking these genes to standard database identifiers), gene ranking based on the overall importance of each gene mentioned in the article, and gene-oriented document retrieval (identifying full text papers relevant to a selected gene). Six systems participated and all processed and displayed the same set of articles. The articles were selected based on content known to be problematic for curation, such as ambiguity of gene names, coverage of multiple genes and species, or introduction of a new gene name. Members of the UAG curated three articles for training and assessment purposes, and each member was assigned a system to review. A questionnaire related to the interface usability and task performance (as measured by precision and recall) was answered after systems were used to curate articles. Although the limited number of articles analyzed and users involved in the IAT experiment precluded rigorous quantitative analysis of the results, a qualitative analysis provided valuable insight into some of the problems encountered by users when using the systems. The overall assessment indicates that the system usability features appealed to most users, but the system performance was suboptimal (mainly due to low accuracy in gene normalization). Some of the issues included failure of species identification and gene name ambiguity in the gene normalization task leading to an extensive list of gene identifiers to review, which, in some cases, did not contain the relevant genes. The document retrieval suffered from the same shortfalls. The UAG favored achieving high performance (measured by precision and recall), but strongly recommended the addition of features that facilitate the identification of correct gene and its identifier, such as contextual information to assist in disambiguation.DiscussionThe IAT was an informative exercise that advanced the dialog between curators and developers and increased the appreciation of challenges faced by each group. A major c...

State-of-the-art in biomedical literature retrieval for clinical cases: a survey of the TREC 2014 CDS track

“…The ShARe/CLEF eHealth Task 3 (Goeuriot et al 2013(Goeuriot et al , 2014 focused on retrieving medical information from the web for consumers (patients), usually in connection with the patient's discharge summary for context. Also of note is the related ImageCLEFmed task (Kalpathy-Cramer et al 2014), where cases were also used as a query into the literature, but the focus was on retrieving medical images, and the BioCreative interactive task (Arighi et al 2011), which focuses on finding scientific articles for genes. Table 1 lists the tasks described above, as well as their reported participation in terms of the number of participants (as opposed to the number of runs).…”

MyMiner: a web application for computer-assisted biocuration and text annotation

“…This showed a decrease of annotation time (up to 90%, average 70%), with no change in the quality of annotation (Supplementary Data Section 2 and Figs 2-13). MyMiner has been evaluated, by the BioCreative User Advisory Group in Biocreative III, Interactive Task (IAT) (Arighi et al, 2011).…”

“…Gene/protein names are automatically recognized and displayed as a list that can be manually edited, and new entities can be added and incorrectly identified ones can be removed. For each gene/protein name, MyMiner suggests a ranked list of UniProt identifiers that utilize the UniProt search scoring mechanism (Arighi et al, 2011). Species mentions are normalized to NCBI taxon identifiers; OMIM identifiers are associated to diseases and ontology terms are linked to identifiers from submitted ontology files.…”

Ranking Interactions for a Curation Task

“…curation' task (IAT) of the BioCreative III competition [19]. This was an informal task without a quantitative evaluation of the participating systems.…”