1995
DOI: 10.1016/0269-7491(94)00072-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioconcentration and biokinetics of heavy metals in the earthworm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

15
61
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
15
61
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The observation that simple ln-ln regression models best fit the data indicates that the bioaccumulation of contaminants by earthworms decreases as soil concentrations increase. Similar conclusions were reported by Neuhauser et al [9]. Mechanisms for this decrease in accumulation may include an increase in elimination rate as soil concentration increases or toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observation that simple ln-ln regression models best fit the data indicates that the bioaccumulation of contaminants by earthworms decreases as soil concentrations increase. Similar conclusions were reported by Neuhauser et al [9]. Mechanisms for this decrease in accumulation may include an increase in elimination rate as soil concentration increases or toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…18,1999 B.E. Sample et al hauser et al [9] and not the current study.) Exceptions were Cr and Ni, for which no estimation method worked well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…These results differ from those in the literature where bioaccumulation of contaminants by earthworms is reported to decrease as soil concentrations increase (Neuhauser et al 1995, Sample et al 1999. The fact that arsenic accumulation in earthworms at DGC does not conform to models in the literature is likely due to their reported resistance to arsenic toxicity (Langdon et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…The bioaccumulation of contaminants can also serve as a measure of the bioavailability of metals in the soil and vice versa (Van Gestel et al, 2002). Body residue is considered a better surrogate for exposure, and this measure, rather than the exposure concentration based on the total metal concentration, can be used to predict toxicity in risk assessments (Neuhauser et al, 1995;Smith et al, 2012). This approach assumes that a certain concentration of a chemical in a living receptor is associated with an adverse biological effect (Pentinnen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%