2009
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.200900478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biocompatible polymeric monoliths for protein and peptide separations

Abstract: The concept of biocompatibility with reference to chromatographic stationary phases for separation of biomolecules (including proteins and peptides) is introduced. Biocompatible is a characteristic that indicates resistance to nonspecific adsorption of biomolecules and preservation of their structures and biochemical functions. Two types of biocompatible polymeric monoliths [i. e., polyacrylamide- and poly(meth)acrylate-based monoliths] used for protein and peptide separations are reviewed in detail, with emph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The typical micro-or nano-LC column packed with ca 3 µm C18 particles shows generally good separation performance, but the practical column length has been less than 20 cm owing to high column back pressure, thus its overall column separation efficiency has been limited. Monolithic columns may be adopted instead, 17,18 but the overall column separation efficiency has been limited, too.…”
Section: 910mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The typical micro-or nano-LC column packed with ca 3 µm C18 particles shows generally good separation performance, but the practical column length has been less than 20 cm owing to high column back pressure, thus its overall column separation efficiency has been limited. Monolithic columns may be adopted instead, 17,18 but the overall column separation efficiency has been limited, too.…”
Section: 910mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2022 One advantage of these materials is the ease with which the chemical properties of the monolith can be optimized for specific analyte classes, either by selecting different monomers/cross-linkers or further modifying the monolith with the intended functional group after polymerization. 23–26, This results in the availability of multiple surface chemistries and improved performance in extraction or separation of specific analytes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In initial studies, ethylene dimethacrylate was used as a crosslinker; however, this monolith formulation suffered from nonspecific adsorption of fluorescent molecules when bacterial lysate samples were introduced. Monoliths prepared with PEGDA as an alternate, more hydrophilic crosslinker [26] showed much less nonspecific adsorption and were therefore used for the reported experiments. The ratio of the porogens, 1-propanol and 1,4-butanediol, was studied regarding monolith morphology (evaluated by SEM) and flow-through properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%