2015 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/biocas.2015.7348398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biocompatible packagings for fully implantable multi-panel devices for remote monitoring of metabolism

Abstract: Abstract-This paper compares three different biocompatible packaging covers suitable to support full implantation of multipanel sensors for remote monitoring of metabolism. The three covers have been designed, realized and implanted in mice for 30 days. ATP and neutrophil concentrations have been measured at the implant site after the device was explanted, to assess the level of biocompatibility of the device.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the authors conclusion, the results stress the importance of (1) miniaturization of the biosensors, “the smaller the better” as well as (2) a need for bioactive, immune-suppressive coatings for long-time body acceptance of the foreign elements. Other coating materials could be silicone or polyurethane . Furthermore, investigations focus on different materials and techniques used as biofluid barriers of implantable devices or biodegradable silicon-based encapsulation layers and electrical interfaces, e.g., for temporary in vivo sensors, biodegradable conducting inks, or degradable supercapacitors for energy storage …”
Section: Sensor Solutions For Point-of-care and In Vivo Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the authors conclusion, the results stress the importance of (1) miniaturization of the biosensors, “the smaller the better” as well as (2) a need for bioactive, immune-suppressive coatings for long-time body acceptance of the foreign elements. Other coating materials could be silicone or polyurethane . Furthermore, investigations focus on different materials and techniques used as biofluid barriers of implantable devices or biodegradable silicon-based encapsulation layers and electrical interfaces, e.g., for temporary in vivo sensors, biodegradable conducting inks, or degradable supercapacitors for energy storage …”
Section: Sensor Solutions For Point-of-care and In Vivo Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failing in these aspects may cause serious injuries to the patients that can even be fatal. [49][50][51][52][53][54]…”
Section: End Notementioning
confidence: 99%